49 C.F.R. § 177.801

Unacceptable hazardous materials shipments

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

No person may accept for transportation or transport by motor vehicle a forbidden material or hazardous material that is not prepared in accordance with the requirements of this subchapter.

[Amdt. 177-87, 61 FR 27175, May 30, 1996]
Notes of Decisions
Clean Harbors Env't Servs., Inc. v. Alexis M. Herman, Sec'y, United States Dep't of Labor & Thomas Dutkiewicz, Intervenor, 146 F.3d 12 (1st Cir. 1998). “See 49 C.F.R. §§ 177.801 , 802. 2 . The job coordinator is the first person to whom the drivers report.”
Multistar Indus., Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of Transp., 707 F.3d 1045 (9th Cir. 2013). “800 (c) (failing to train hazardous materials employee), identified as Violation 4 in the compliance report; 49 C.F.R. § 177.801 (transporting or accepting a shipment of hazardous materials not in proper condition for transportation or not certified as to proper packaging,…”
Colorado Pyrotechnic Ass'n v. Meyer, 740 F. Supp. 792 (D. Colo. 1990). “49 C.F.R. § 177.801 (1989). Plaintiff contends that the language of this regulation preempts the Colorado statute’s requirement that, if fireworks are to be shipped out of the state in the purchaser’s vehicle, the vehicle must be licensed in *795 a state other than Colorado.”
South Dakota Dep't of Pub. Saf. ex rel. Melgaard v. Haddenham, 339 N.W.2d 786 (S.D. 1983). “” Additionally, 49 C.F.R. § 177.801 (1982) provides in part: “Hazardous materials except such as may not be accepted and transported under Parts 170-189 of this subchapter, may be accepted and transported by private, common and contract carriers by motor vehicle engaged in…”
Sd Dept. of Pub. Saf. v. Haddenham, 339 N.W.2d 786 (S.D. 1983). “" Additionally, 49 C.F.R. § 177.801 (1982) provides in part: "Hazardous materials except such as may not be accepted and transported under Parts 170-189 of this subchapter, may be accepted and transported by private, common and contract carriers by motor vehicle engaged in…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.