49 C.F.R. § 219.17

Construction

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Nothing in this part—

(a) Restricts the power of FRA to conduct investigations under sections 20107, 20108, 20111, and 20112 of title 49, United States Code;

(b) Creates a private right of action on the part of any person for enforcement of the provisions of this part or for damages resulting from noncompliance with this part; or

(c) Impacts provisions of State criminal law that impose sanctions for reckless conduct that leads to actual loss of life, injury or damage to property, whether such provisions apply specifically to railroad employees or generally to the public at large.

[78 FR 14225, Mar. 5, 2013]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1991–2005 · leading case: Charles v. Abate, Jr. v. S. Pac. Transp. Co., 928 F.2d 167 (5th Cir. 1991).
Charles v. Abate, Jr. v. S. Pac. Transp. Co., 928 F.2d 167 (5th Cir. 1991). “The regulations, as opposed to the statute, evince a positive intent to deny private remedies for violations of the drug-testing rules or any other rules: “Nothing in this part .”
Conboy v. at & T Corp., 84 F. Supp. 2d 492 (S.D.N.Y. 2000). “43 (e) (same); 49 C.F.R. § 219.17 (b) (same); 17 C.F.R. § 200.”
Phonetel Tech., Inc. v. Network Enhanced Telecom, 197 F. Supp. 2d 720 (E.D. Tex. 2002). “43 (e) (same); 49 C.F.R. § 219.17 (b) (same); 17 C.F.R. § 200.”
Fifie v. Cooksey, 403 F. Supp. 2d 1131 (M.D. Fla. 2005). “The court noted that regulation in 49 C.F.R. 219.17(b) specifically states: “Nothing in this part .”
— 49 C.F.R. § 219.17(b) — 1 case
Fifie v. Cooksey, 403 F. Supp. 2d 1131 (M.D. Fla. 2005). “The court noted that regulation in 49 C.F.R. 219.17(b) specifically states: “Nothing in this part .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.