C.F.R. » Title 49 » CHAPTER II—FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION › PART 235—INSTRUCTIONS GOVERNING APPLICATIONS FOR APPROVAL OF A DISCONTINUANCE OR MATERIAL MODIFICATION OF A SIGNAL SYSTEM OR RELIEF FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF PART 236

49 C.F.R. § 235.5

Changes requiring filing of application

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Except as provided in § 235.7, applications shall be filed to cover the following:

(1) The discontinuance of a block signal system, interlocking, traffic control system, automatic train stop, train control, or cab signal system or other similar appliance or device;

(2) The decrease of the limits of a block signal system, interlocking, traffic control system, automatic train stop, train control, or cab signal system; or

(3) The modification of a block signal system, interlocking, traffic control system, automatic train stop, train control, or cab signal system.

(b) [Reserved]

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 2130-0042)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2001–2001 · leading case: Roth v. I & M Rail Link, L.L.C., 179 F. Supp. 2d 1054 (S.D. Iowa 2001).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Roth v. I & M Rail Link, L.L.C., 179 F. Supp. 2d 1054 (S.D. Iowa 2001). “” 49 C.F.R. § 235.5 . Roth’s expert, William Bogett, testified that at impact the tank hit the collision post on the engineer side of the locomotive’s cab, the collision post weld failed at the deck, and the tank car crushed the cab, killing both Arnold Roth and Finzel.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.