C.F.R. » Title 49 » PART 24—UNIFORM RELOCATION ASSISTANCE AND REAL PROPERTY ACQUISITION FOR FEDERAL AND FEDERALLY ASSISTED PROGRAMS › Subpart A—General

49 C.F.R. § 24.1

Purpose

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The purpose of this part is to promulgate rules to implement the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4601 et seq.) (Uniform Act), in accordance with the following objectives:

(a) To ensure that owners of real property to be acquired for Federal and federally assisted projects are treated fairly and consistently, to encourage and expedite acquisition by agreements with such owners, to minimize litigation and relieve congestion in the courts, and to promote public confidence in Federal and federally assisted land acquisition programs;

(b) To ensure that persons displaced as a direct result of Federal or federally assisted projects are treated fairly, consistently, and equitably so that such displaced persons will not suffer disproportionate injuries as a result of projects designed for the benefit of the public as a whole; and

(c) To ensure that agencies implement the regulations in this part in a manner that is efficient and cost effective.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1995–2025 · leading case: Wireless One v. Mayor & Cty. Cncl. of Balt., 465 Md. 588 (Md. 2019).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Wireless One v. Mayor & Cty. Cncl. of Balt., 465 Md. 588 (Md. 2019). “” 49 CFR 24.1(b). Federal funding is conditioned on state compliance with these provisions.”
Rollock Co. v. United States, 115 Fed. Cl. 317 (Fed. Cl. 2014). “” 49 C.F.R. § 24.1 (a); see also 42 U.S.C. § 4651 .”
West Virginia Dep't of Transp. v. Dodson Mobile Homes Sales & Servs., Inc., 624 S.E.2d 468 (W. Va. 2005). “See 49 C.F.R. § 24.1 (1989). The import of these various statutory and regulatory provisions is that they apply equally to state agencies carrying out responsibilities detailed in the federal law.”
In Re Relocation Benefits of James Bros. Furniture, Inc., 642 N.W.2d 91 (Minn. Ct. App. 2002). “See 49 C.F.R. § 24.1 (2000) (stating that the purpose of the federal act is to treat displaced persons “fairly, consistently, and equitably so that such persons will not suffer disproportionate injuries” (emphasis added)).”
In Re Relocation Benefits of Wilkins Pontiac, Inc., 530 N.W.2d 571 (Minn. Ct. App. 1995). “The regulations implementing this statute are found at 49 C.F.R. §§ 24.1 -.603 (1991). 1. Carrying costs Wilkins believes that the carrying costs incurred on the Westinghouse property are compensable relocation benefits as they are tantamount to rent for that site.”
Orleans Par. Sch. Bd. v. State, Div. of Admin. & the Bd. of Supervisors, 158 So. 3d 846 (La. Ct. App. 2015). “” 49 C.F.R. § 24.1 (b). Within the context of the URA, a person is defined as “any individual, family, partnership, corporation, or association.”
Burton v. Cleveland Empowerment Zone Off., 271 F. Supp. 2d 1034 (N.D. Ohio 2003). · cites it 2× “and 49 C.F.R. § 24.1 . The Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real.”
Pener v. King (Kan. 2017). “See 49 C.F.R. § 24.1 (2015). The reference in K.”
Wireless One v. Mayor & Cty. Cncl. of Balt. (Md. 2019). “” 49 CFR 24.1(b). Federal funding is conditioned on state compliance with these provisions.”
Pac. Coast Shredding, Llc, Appellant/cross-res. v. Port Of Vancouver, Usa, Res/cross-app. (Wash. Ct. App. 2020). “§§ 4601-4655 ) and its corresponding regulations ( 49 C.F.R. § 24.1 -.306).1 The Washington State Department of Transportation Right of Way Manual (Aug.”
Michael Fernandez, D.D.S., Ltd. v. Comm'r of Highways (E.D. Va. 2024). “27, 1985) (designating USDOT as lead agency under URA); 49 C.F.R. § 24.1 . Although the district court in Clear Sky did not explicitly cabin its APA analysis to USDOT, the fact that the plaintiffs sued the federal agency responsible for implementing the URA made their APA claim…”
Kunz v. FAA (10th Cir. 2025). “§ 4655 (requiring assurances from grant recipients that “in acquiring real property it will be guided, to the greatest extent practicable under State law, by the land acquisition policies in section 4651 of this title and the provisions of section 4652 of this title” (emphasis…”
Show all 16 citing cases →
— 49 C.F.R. § 24.1(b) — 2 cases
Wireless One v. Mayor & Cty. Cncl. of Balt., 465 Md. 588 (Md. 2019). “” 49 CFR 24.1(b). Federal funding is conditioned on state compliance with these provisions.”
Wireless One v. Mayor & Cty. Cncl. of Balt. (Md. 2019). “” 49 CFR 24.1(b). Federal funding is conditioned on state compliance with these provisions.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.