49 C.F.R. § 37.147
Considerations during FTA review
In reviewing each plan, at a minimum FTA will consider the following:
(a) Whether the plan was filed on time;
(b) Comments submitted by the state, if applicable;
(c) Whether the plan contains responsive elements for each component required under § 37.139 of this part;
(d) Whether the plan, when viewed in its entirety, provides for paratransit service comparable to the entity's fixed route service;
(e) Whether the entity complied with the public participation efforts required by this part; and
(f) The extent to which efforts were made to coordinate with other public entities with overlapping or contiguous service areas or jurisdictions.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 2004–2004 · leading case: Melton v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit, 391 F.3d 669 (5th Cir. 2004).
Melton v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit, 391 F.3d 669 (5th Cir. 2004). “49 C.F.R. § 37.147 (d). On the other hand, the Meltons argue that both the regulations and the statutory language require DART to make reasonable modifications to its paratransit service.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.