49 C.F.R. § 37.61

Public transportation programs and activities in existing facilities

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) A public entity shall operate a designated public transportation program or activity conducted in an existing facility so that, when viewed in its entirety, the program or activity is readily accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities.

(b) This section does not require a public entity to make structural changes to existing facilities in order to make the facilities accessible by individuals who use wheelchairs, unless and to the extent required by § 37.43 (with respect to alterations) or §§ 37.47 or 37.51 of this part (with respect to key stations). Entities shall comply with other applicable accessibility requirements for such facilities.

(c) Public entities, with respect to facilities that, as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, are not required to be made accessible to individuals who use wheelchairs, are not required to provide to such individuals services made available to the general public at such facilities when the individuals could not utilize or benefit from the services.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2018–2024 · leading case: Brooklyn Ctr. for Indep. of the Disabled v. Metro. Transp. Auth., 11 F.4th 55 (2d Cir. 2021).
Brooklyn Ctr. for Indep. of the Disabled v. Metro. Transp. Auth., 11 F.4th 55 (2d Cir. 2021). “, require that the provider of a transportation service must “maintain in operative condition those features of facilities . . . that are required to make the .”
Woods v. Centro of Oneida, Inc., 103 F.4th 933 (2d Cir. 2024). “§ 12148 (a)(1) (emphasis added); see also 49 C.F.R. § 37.61 (implementing section 12148(a)).”
Williams v. Chicago Transit Auth. (N.D. Ill. 2018). “”); 49 C.F.R. § 37.61 (providing that a public entity is not required “to make structural changes to existing facilities in order to make the facilities accessible by individuals who use wheelchairs, unless and to the extent required by § 37.”
O.E. v. New Orleans Reg'l Transit Auth. (E.D. La. 2024). “§ 12148 (a)(1); 49 C.F.R. § 37.61 (a). 85 49 C.F.R. § 37.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.