C.F.R. » Title 49 » CHAPTER VI—FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION › PART 604—CHARTER SERVICE › Subpart B—Exceptions

49 C.F.R. § 604.10

Agreement with registered charter providers

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) A recipient may provide charter service directly to a customer if there is an agreement with all registered charter providers in the recipient's geographic service area.

(b) If a new charter provider registers in the geographic service area subsequent to the initial agreement, the recipient may continue to provide charter service under the previous agreement with the other charter providers up to 90 days without an agreement with the newly registered charter provider.

(c) Any of the parties to an agreement may cancel the agreement at any time after providing the recipient a 90-day notice.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1978–2010 · leading case: United Motorcoach Ass'n, Inc. v. Welbes, 614 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United Motorcoach Ass'n, Inc. v. Welbes, 614 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2009). “49 C.F.R. § 604.10 . Recipients may also provide charter service if, after receiving notice of the service need, no registered charter provider expresses interest in providing such service.”
Local Div. 519, Amalgamated Transit Union v. LaCrosse Mun. Transit Util., 445 F. Supp. 798 (W.D. Wis. 1978). “regarding transportation services for elderly and handicapped persons; 49 C.F.R. § 604.10 et seq. regarding charter bus agreements; and 49 C.”
Am. Bus Ass'n, Inc. v. Rogoff, 717 F. Supp. 2d 73 (D.D.C. 2010). “” 49 C.F.R. § 604.10 . 9 . Plaintiffs also allege that KCM lobbied for the Murray Amendment’s enactment (UMA Compl.”
United Motorcoach Ass'n, Inc. v. Rogoff (D.D.C. 2010). “This Court agreed and dismissed UMA’s complaint as moot, citing the expiration of the Administrator’s grant of an exception, 8 A recipient may also provide charter service “consistent with an agreement entered into with all registered charter providers in the recipient’s…”
United Motorcoach Ass'n, Inc. v. Simpson (D.D.C. 2009). “49 C.F.R. § 604.10 . Recipients may also provide charter service if, after receiving notice of the service need, no registered charter provider expresses interest in providing such service.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.