C.F.R. » Title 49 » CHAPTER VIII—NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD › PART 821—RULES OF PRACTICE IN AIR SAFETY PROCEEDINGS › Subpart B—General Rules Applicable to Petitions for Review, Appeals to the Board, and Appeals From Law Judges Initial Decisions and Appealable Orders

49 C.F.R. § 821.11

Extensions of time

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) On written request filed with the Board and served on all other parties, or oral request with any extension granted confirmed in writing and served on all other parties by the requestor, and for good cause shown, the law judge or the Board may grant an extension of time to file any document; however, no extension of time will be granted for the filing of a document to which a statutory time limit applies.

(b) Extensions of time to file petitions for reconsideration shall not be granted upon a showing of good cause, but only in extraordinary circumstances.

(c) The General Counsel is authorized to grant unopposed extensions of time on timely oral request without a showing of good cause in cases on appeal to the Board from a law judge's initial decision or appealable order. Written confirmation of such a grant of extension of time must promptly be sent by the requesting party to the Board and served on all other parties to the proceeding.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1992–2009 · leading case: Gorman v. Nat'l Transp. Saf. Bd., 558 F.3d 580 (D.C. Cir. 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Gorman v. Nat'l Transp. Saf. Bd., 558 F.3d 580 (D.C. Cir. 2009). “See 49 C.F.R. § 821.11 (b) (“Extensions of time to file petitions for reconsideration shall .”
George O. Grant v. Nat'l Transp. Saf. Bd., Fed. Aviation Admin., 959 F.2d 1483 (9th Cir. 1992). · cites it 3× “The petitioner has argued that 49 C.F.R. § 821.11 deprives the NTSB of the power to reverse an AU finding of good cause for delay.”
Hadley v. Blakey, 160 F. App'x 612 (9th Cir. 2005). “At best, his argument amounts to a claim that he was required to act quickly in a circumstance where action was difficult and, consequently, he did not attempt to meet the deadline or request an extension.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.