49 C.F.R. § 821.2

Applicability and description of part

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The provisions of this part govern all air safety proceedings, including proceedings before a law judge on petition for review of the denial of any airman certificate (including a medical certificate), or on appeal from any order of the Administrator amending, modifying, suspending or revoking a certificate. The provisions of this part also govern all proceedings on appeal from an order of the Administrator imposing a civil penalty on a flight engineer, mechanic, pilot or repairman, or a person acting in such capacity. All proceedings on appeal to the Board from any initial decision or order of a law judge are also governed by this part.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1995–2012 · leading case: Porco v. Huerta, 472 F. App'x 2 (D.C. Cir. 2012).
Porco v. Huerta, 472 F. App'x 2 (D.C. Cir. 2012). “She did not raise these objections before the Board and offers no “reasonable ground” for failing to do so.”
U.S. v. Emerson (D.N.H. 1995). “49 C.F.R. § 821.2 (1994). Section 821.33 is a provision governing administrative air safety proceedings which does not apply to claims properly brought in a federal district court.”
U.S. V. Emerson (D.N.H. 1995). “49 C.F.R. § 821.2 (1994) . Section 821.33 is a provision governing administrative air safety proceedings which does not apply to claims properly brought in a federal district court.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.