49 C.F.R. § 835.4
Use of reports
(a) As a testimonial aid and to refresh their memories, Board employees may use copies of the factual accident report they prepared, and may refer to and cite from that report during testimony.
(b) Consistent with section 701(e) of the FA Act and section 304(c) of the Safety Act, a Board employee may not use the Board's accident report for any purpose during his testimony.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1990–2016 · leading case: United States v. Pac. Gas & Elec. Co., 178 F. Supp. 3d 927 (N.D. Cal. 2016).
United States v. Pac. Gas & Elec. Co., 178 F. Supp. 3d 927 (N.D. Cal. 2016). “See 49 C.F.R. § 835.4 (b) (“Consistent with section 701(e) of the FA Act and section 304(c) of the Safety Act, a Board employee may not use the Board’s accident report for any purpose during his testimony.”
Thomas Brooks Chartered, a Prof'l Corp. v. James Burnett, Norman Wiemeyer, & the Nat'l Transp. Saf. Bd., 920 F.2d 634 (10th Cir. 1990). “49 C.F.R. § 835.4 . See, e.g., Keen v. Detroit Diesel Allison, 569 F.”
In Re Air Crash Disaster at Sioux City, Iowa, 780 F. Supp. 1207 (N.D. Ill. 1991). “41541 (1990) (to be codified at 49 C.F.R. 835.4 (1991)). The current regulations further prohibit investigators from testifying in court, and instead limit NTSB employee testimony to deposition form.”
Laura Coffey v. Cherokee Aviation, Inc. (Tenn. Ct. App. 1995). “See 49 C.F.R. § 835.4 (a) (2000). While testifying, the employee may refer to and cite from the factual accident report.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.