5 C.F.R. § 1201.63
Stipulations
The parties may stipulate to any matter of fact. The stipulation will satisfy a party's burden of proving the fact alleged.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19
cases (9 in the last 5 years), 2003–2025 · leading case: Wrocklage v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 769 F.3d 1363 (Fed. Cir. 2014).
Wrocklage v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 769 F.3d 1363 (Fed. Cir. 2014). “” 5 C.F.R. § 1201.63 . Mr. Wrocklage stipulated to the facts of Charge 2 — that he sent the email with the TECS report attached.”
Alexander Buelna v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 2014 MSPB 45 (MSPB 2014). “See 5 C.F.R. § 1201.63 . However, because the exhaustive list of issues to be adjudicated did not include the merits of the agency’s second charge, i.”
Alexander Buelna v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 2014 MSPB 45 (MSPB 2014). “See 5 C.F.R. § 1201.63 . However, because the exhaustive list of issues to be adjudicated did not include the merits of the agency’s second charge, i.”
Paul G. Miranne v. Dep't of the Navy, 2014 MSPB 42 (MSPB 2014). “5 C.F.R. § 1201.63 (parties may stipulate to any matter of fact).”
Paul G. Miranne v. Dep't of the Navy, 2014 MSPB 42 (MSPB 2014). “5 C.F.R. § 1201.63 (parties may stipulate to any matter of fact).”
Diana E. Cantu v. Dep't of Homeland Sec. (MSPB 2016). “271 , 275 (1998) (stating that parties may stipulate to any matter of fact and the stipulation will satisfy a party’s burden of proving the fact alleged); 5 C.F.R. § 1201.63 . Accordingly, we find no reason to disturb the administrative judge’s finding that the agency proved…”
Robert D. Eldridge v. Dep't of the Navy (MSPB 2016). “; see 5 C.F.R. § 1201.63 (the parties may stipulate to any matter of fact, and the stipulation will satisfy a party’s burden of proving the fact alleged); see also Cole v.”
Eustolio C. Garcia v. Dep't of Homeland Sec. (MSPB 2016). “271 , 275 (1998); 5 C.F.R. § 1201.63 . Thus, the testimony of the investigator would have been duplicative and unnecessary, and the administrative judge would have been within his discretion to deny the witness if either party had attempted to call her.”
Christopher Skubik v. Dep't of the Army (MSPB 2023). “5 C.F.R. § 1201.63 (providing that parties may stipulate to matters of fact).”
Jennifer Eoff v. Dep't of the Interior (MSPB 2023). “IAF, Tab 22 at 8-10, Tab 30 at 13-16; see 5 C.F.R. § 1201.63 (indicating that a stipulation will satisfy a party’s burden of proving the fact alleged); 5 C.”
Keisha Hudson v. Dep't of Homeland Sec. (MSPB 2024). “IAF, Tab 16 at 5-6 (stipulations 6-7, 9), Tab 4, Subtab 4d at 24-28 (the appellant’s November 22, 2017 statement); see 5 C.F.R. § 1201.63 (providing that the parties may stipulate to any matter of fact and that the stipulation will satisfy a party’s burden of proving the fact…”
Precious Wiggins v. Dep't of Homeland Sec. (MSPB 2024). “AF-2, Tab 19 at 2 (Stipulations, ¶¶ 2-3); see 5 C.F.R. § 1201.63 (stating that a stipulation of fact satisfies a party’s burden of proving the fact alleged).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.