5 C.F.R. § 2423.29
[Reserved]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases, 1985–2005 · leading case: Am. Fed'n of Gov't Employees, Afl-Cio, Local 3090 v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 777 F.2d 751 (D.C. Cir. 1985).
Am. Fed'n of Gov't Employees, Afl-Cio, Local 3090 v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 777 F.2d 751 (D.C. Cir. 1985). “§ 7118 (a)(7)(D); 5 C.F.R. § 2423.29 . This "other action” may include the posting of a notice indicating that an agency has been found to have committed an unfair labor practice and that it has been ordered to cease committing such practices in the future.”
Ass'n of Admin. Law Judges v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 397 F.3d 957 (D.C. Cir. 2005). “§ 7118 (a)(7)(D); 5 C.F.R. § 2423.29 . This "other action” may include the posting of a notice indicating that an agency has been found to have committed an unfair labor practice and that it has been ordered to cease committing such practices in the future .”
Fed. Employees Metal Trades Council, Afl-Cio v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., Dep't of the Navy, Intervenor-Respondent. Am. Fed'n of Gov't Employees, Local 1533 v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., Dep't of the Navy, Intervenor-Respondent, 778 F.2d 1429 (9th Cir. 1985). “While these decisions have no precedential value, see 5 C.F.R. 2423.29(a) (1984), their inherent pursuasiveness is open to the court to consider.”
Fed. Labor Relations Auth. v. U.S. Dep't of Just., 137 F.3d 683 (2d Cir. 1997). “; 5 C.F.R. § 2423.29 (a) (1997). Thereafter, the FLRA applied to this Court for enforcement of its July 30, 1996, order.”
Fed. Labor Relations Auth. v. U.S. Dep't of Just., 125 F.3d 106 (2d Cir. 1997). “; 5 C.F.R. § 2423.29 (a) (1997). Thereafter, the FLRA applied to this Court for enforcement of its July 30, 1996, order.”
Fed. Labor Relations Auth. v. Nat'l Aeronautics & Space Admin., 120 F.3d 1208 (11th Cir. 1997). “1993); see also 5 C.F.R. § 2423.29 (a) (“After considering the Administrative Law Judge’s decision, the record, and any exceptions and related submissions filed, the Authority shall issue its decision affirming or reversing the Administrative Law Judge, in whole, or in part, or…”
Fed. Employees Metal Trades Council v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 778 F.2d 1429 (9th Cir. 1985). “While these decisions have no precedential value, *1432 see 5 C.F.R. 2423.29(a) (1984), their inherent pursuasiveness is open to the court to consider.”
Flra v. Nasa (11th Cir. 1997). “1993); see also 5 C.F.R. § 2423.29 (a) ("After considering the Administrative Law Judge's decision, the record, and any exceptions and related submissions filed, the Authority shall issue its decision 12 affirming or reversing the Administrative Law Judge, in whole, or in part,…”
— 5 C.F.R. § 2423.29(a) — 2 cases
Fed. Employees Metal Trades Council, Afl-Cio v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., Dep't of the Navy, Intervenor-Respondent. Am. Fed'n of Gov't Employees, Local 1533 v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., Dep't of the Navy, Intervenor-Respondent, 778 F.2d 1429 (9th Cir. 1985). “While these decisions have no precedential value, see 5 C.F.R. 2423.29(a) (1984), their inherent pursuasiveness is open to the court to consider.”
Fed. Employees Metal Trades Council v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 778 F.2d 1429 (9th Cir. 1985). “While these decisions have no precedential value, *1432 see 5 C.F.R. 2423.29(a) (1984), their inherent pursuasiveness is open to the court to consider.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.