C.F.R. » Title 5 » CHAPTER I—OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT › SUBCHAPTER B—CIVIL SERVICE REGULATIONS › PART 551—PAY ADMINISTRATION UNDER THE FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT › Subpart B—Exemptions and Exclusions

5 C.F.R. § 551.207

Professional exemption criteria

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

To qualify for the professional exemption, an employee's primary duty must be the performance of work requiring knowledge of an advanced type in a field of science or learning customarily acquired by a prolonged course of specialized intellectual instruction or requiring invention, imagination, originality or talent in a recognized field of artistic or creative endeavor. Learned professionals, creative professionals, and computer employees are described in §§ 551.208, 551.209, and 551.210, respectively.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2005–2008 · leading case: Grandits v. United States, 66 Fed. Cl. 519 (Fed. Cl. 2005).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Grandits v. United States, 66 Fed. Cl. 519 (Fed. Cl. 2005). · cites it 16× “Grandits and others in the lawsuit, defendant claims administrative and professional exemptions from the FLSA overtime provisions.”
Astor v. United States, 79 Fed. Cl. 303 (Fed. Cl. 2007). · cites it 9× “303 (a) (2004); 5 C.F.R. § 551.207 (pre-2007); 5 C.F.R. § 551.”
Corrigan v. United States, 68 Fed. Cl. 589 (Fed. Cl. 2005). · cites it 8× “5 C.F.R. § 551.207 . The primary duty test is met if the employee performs work that: requires knowledge in a field of .”
Corrigan v. United States, 82 Fed. Cl. 301 (Fed. Cl. 2008). · cites it 2× “4 See 5 C.F.R. § 551.207 , et seq. (2008) (FLSA) (describing revised criteria for and new categories of professional exemption under the FLSA, effective October 17, 2007); see also 5 C.”
— 5 C.F.R. § 551.207(a)(1) — 1 case
Grandits v. United States, 66 Fed. Cl. 519 (Fed. Cl. 2005). “Grandits and others in the lawsuit, defendant claims administrative and professional exemptions from the FLSA overtime provisions.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.