C.F.R. » Title 50 » CHAPTER IV—JOINT REGULATIONS (UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR AND NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE); ENDANGERED SPECIES COMMITTEE REGULATIONS › SUBCHAPTER A › PART 424—LISTING ENDANGERED AND THREATENED SPECIES AND DESIGNATING CRITICAL HABITAT › Subpart B—Revision of the Lists

50 C.F.R. § 424.10

General

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The Secretary may add a species to the lists or designate critical habitat, delete a species or critical habitat, change the listed status of a species, revise the boundary of an area designated as critical habitat, or adopt or modify special rules (see 50 CFR 17.40-17.48 and parts 222 and 227) applied to a threatened species only in accordance with the procedures of this part.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2005–2018 · leading case: Conservancy of Sw. Florida v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Serv., 677 F.3d 1073 (11th Cir. 2012).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Conservancy of Sw. Florida v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Serv., 677 F.3d 1073 (11th Cir. 2012). “” 50 C.F.R. §§ 424.10 , 424.14(a). 6 . The ESA requires the Secretary to develop recovery plans "for the conservation and survival of endangered species and threatened species.”
Wyoming v. United States Dep't of the Interior, 360 F. Supp. 2d 1214 (D. Wyo. 2005). “See 50 C.F.R. § 424.10 (“The Secretary may add.”
Otay Mesa Prop., L.P. v. U.S. Dep't of the Interior, 344 F. Supp. 3d 355 (D.C. Cir. 2018). “See 50 C.F.R. § 424.10 . When the agency undertakes to list a species under the ESA or make a critical habitat designation, the ESA requires the agency to rely on the best available scientific data.”
Otay Mesa Prop., L.P. v. United States Dep't of the Interior, No. 2013-0240 (D.D.C. Sept. 25, 2018). “See 50 C.F.R. § 424.10 . 14 When the agency undertakes to list a species under the ESA or make a critical habitat designation, the ESA requires the agency to rely on the best available scientific data.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.