50 C.F.R. § 80.21
What if a State diverts license revenue from the control of its fish and wildlife agency?
The Director may declare a State to be in diversion if it violates the requirements of § 80.10 by diverting license revenue from the control of its fish and wildlife agency to purposes other than the agency's administration. The State is then ineligible to receive benefits under the relevant Act from the date the Director signs the declaration until the date the State resolves the diversion. Only the Director may declare a State to be in diversion, and only the Director may rescind the declaration.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1995–2018 · leading case: Buckley v. City of Redding, 66 F.3d 188 (9th Cir. 1995).
Buckley v. City of Redding, 66 F.3d 188 (9th Cir. 1995). “The City directs us to 50 C.F.R. § 80.21 , which states that “[t]he Secretary shall have the right to review or inspect for compliance at any time.”
Fund for Animals v. Babbitt, 2 F. Supp. 2d 562 (D. Vt. 1996). “It is true that a participating state “must agree to and certify that it will comply with all applicable Federal laws_” 50 C.F.R. § 80.21 . Nevertheless, it is clear that it is the state, and not the federal agency, that controls activities under any partially-fimded program: In…”
New Jersey Outdoor All. Vs. New Jersey Dep't of Env't Prot. (Dep't of Env't Prot.), No. A-0525-18T4 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. Nov. 16, 2018). “50 C.F.R. § 80.21 ; Sportsmen's Wildlife Def.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.