C.F.R. » Title 7 » CHAPTER XIV—COMMODITY CREDIT CORPORATION, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE › SUBCHAPTER A—GENERAL REGULATIONS AND POLICIES › PART 1405—LOANS, PURCHASES, AND OTHER OPERATIONS

7 C.F.R. § 1405.1

Interest

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Except as may otherwise be determined by CCC as provided in individual program regulations, program contracts or such other means as deemed appropriate by CCC the rate of interest that is applicable to CCC loans shall be equal to the rate of interest charged by the U.S. Treasury for funds borrowed by CCC on the date the loan is disbursed by CCC, plus 1 percent. This rate of interest shall be in effect until the earlier of the maturity of the loan or the next January 1.

(b) The rate of interest applicable to all CCC loans that are outstanding as of January 1 of any year shall be adjusted as of such date to equal the rate of interest charged by the U.S. Treasury for funds borrowed by CCC on such date, plus 1 percent. This rate shall be in effect until the earlier of the maturity of the loan or the next January 1. The rate of interest applicable to CCC loans as of January 1 of any year shall be announced by CCC by press release or other means.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2004–2006 · leading case: Holly Sugar Corp v. Johanns, Mike, 437 F.3d 1210 (D.C. Cir. 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Holly Sugar Corp v. Johanns, Mike, 437 F.3d 1210 (D.C. Cir. 2006). · cites it 2× “25, 1988) (codified as amended at 7 C.F.R. § 1405.1 ). The CCC issued this regulation under its statutory authority to “make such loans .”
Holly Sugar Corp. v. Veneman, 355 F. Supp. 2d 181 (D.D.C. 2005). · cites it 2× “See 7 C.F.R. § 1405.1 (1989). This regulation, which has since been amended, was promulgated based upon the CCC’s interpretation of 15 U.”
Holly Sugar Corp. v. Veneman, 335 F. Supp. 2d 100 (D.D.C. 2004). · cites it 2× “See 7 C.F.R. § 1405.1 (1989). This regulation, which has since been amended, was promulgated based upon the CCC’s interpretation of 15 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.