C.F.R. » Title 7 » CHAPTER XIV—COMMODITY CREDIT CORPORATION, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE › SUBCHAPTER B—LOANS, PURCHASES, AND OTHER OPERATIONS › PART 1410—CONSERVATION RESERVE PROGRAM

7 C.F.R. § 1410.1

Administration

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) is administered under the general supervision and direction of the Executive Vice President, Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC), the Administrator, Farm Service Agency (FSA), or a designee, or the Deputy Administrator, FSA; and will be carried out by the FSA State and county committees (“State committees” and “county committees,” respectively).

(b) State executive directors, county executive directors, and State and county committees do not have the authority to modify or waive any of the provisions in this part unless specifically authorized by the Deputy Administrator.

(c) The State committee may take any action authorized or required by this part to be taken by the county committee, but which has not been taken by such county committee, including, but not limited to:

(1) Correct or require a county committee to correct any action taken by such county committee that is not in accordance with this part; or

(2) Require a county committee to withhold taking any action that is not in accordance with this part.

(d) No delegation of authority herein to a State or county committee will preclude the Executive Vice President, CCC, the Administrator, FSA, or a designee, or the Deputy Administrator, from determining any question arising under this part or from reversing or modifying any determination made by a State or county committee.

(e) Data furnished by producers will be used to determine eligibility for CRP benefits. Furnishing the data is voluntary; however, the failure to provide data could result in CRP benefits being withheld or denied.

(f) Notwithstanding other provisions of this section, the suitability of land for permanent vegetative or water cover, factors for determining the likelihood of improved water quality, and adequacy of the planned practice to achieve desired objectives will be determined by the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) or other sources approved by the Deputy Administrator, in accordance with the Field Office Technical Guide (FOTG) of NRCS or other guidelines deemed appropriate by NRCS. In no case will such determination compel the Deputy Administrator to execute a CRP contract that the Deputy Administrator does not believe will serve the purposes of CRP established by this part. Any approved technical authority will use CRP guidelines established by the Deputy Administrator.

(g) The regulations in this part apply to all CRP contracts approved after December 6, 2019.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2004–2023 · leading case: People v. Pitman, 813 N.E.2d 93 (Ill. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
People v. Pitman, 813 N.E.2d 93 (Ill. 2004). · cites it 2× “(2000); 7 C.F.R. § 1410.1 et seq. (2002)). White testified that defendant helped her to "fix the barn, roofs on the barn.”
Mark Mittelstadt v. Sonny Perdue, 913 F.3d 626 (7th Cir. 2019). “The FSA and the Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service also have issued, for use by the state and county committees, handbooks detailing the procedures and requirements for implementing and participating in the CRP.”
C.P. Bedrock, LLC v. Denver Cnty. Bd. of Equalization, 259 P.3d 514 (Colo. Ct. App. 2011). “See Conservation Reserve Program Final Rule, 7 C.F.R. §§ 1410.1 to 1410.68 (2010) (final rule adopted May 14, 2004); Conservation Reserve Program Long-Term Policy, 69 Fed.”
Mark Mittelstadt v. Sonny Perdue (7th Cir. 2019). “7 C.F.R. § 1410.1 (a). The Agricultural Stabilization and Conser- vation Service, which operates through state and county com- mittees, administers the CRP on behalf of the CCC.”
Mark Mittelstadt v. Sonny Perdue (7th Cir. 2019). “7 C.F.R. § 1410.1 (a). The Agricultural Stabilization and Conser- vation Service, which operates through state and county com- mittees, administers the CRP on behalf of the CCC.”
Gilham v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2023). “7 C.F.R. § 1410.1 . A “producer” may enroll eligible land in the CRP by contracting with the Commodity Credit Corporation.”
People v. Pitman (Ill. 2004). “(2000); 7 C.F.R. §1410.1 et seq. (2002)). White testified that defendant helped her to “fix the barn, roofs on the barn.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.