7 C.F.R. § 1580.504

Debarment, suspension, and penalties

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Generally. The regulations governing nonprocurement debarment and suspension, 2 CFR part 417, and requirements for drug-free workplace (financial assistance), 2 CFR part 421, apply to this part.

(b) Additional specific suspension and debarment provision for this program. In addition to any other debarment or suspension of a producer under paragraph (a) of this section, in connection with this program, if the Administrator (FAS) or a court of competent jurisdiction, determines that a producer:

(1) Knowingly has made, or caused another to make, a false statement or representation of a material fact, or

(2) Knowingly has failed, or caused another to fail, to disclose a material fact; and, as a result of such false statement or representation, or of such nondisclosure, such producer has received any payment under this program to which the producer was not entitled, the Administrator (FAS) shall suspend and debar such producer from any future payments under this program, as provided in 19 U.S.C. 2401f(b).

(c) Criminal penalty. Whoever makes a false statement of a material fact knowing it to be false, or knowingly fails to disclose a material fact, for the purpose of obtaining or increasing for himself or for any other producer any payments authorized to be furnished under this program shall be fined not more that $10,000 or imprisoned for not more than 1 year, or both.

[75 FR 9089, Mar. 1, 2010, as amended at 85 FR 31938, May 28, 2020]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2007–2007 · leading case: O'Toole v. U.S. Sec'y of Agric., 471 F. Supp. 2d 1323 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2007).
O'Toole v. U.S. Sec'y of Agric., 471 F. Supp. 2d 1323 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2007). “§ 2401f(e) (material false statement and/or failure to disclose material fact for purpose of obtaining or increasing Ag-TAA payments punishable by fine of up to $10,000 and/or one year in prison); 7 C.F.R. § 1580.504 (e) (same). 23 . See also n.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.