8 C.F.R. § 1214.2

Review of alien victims of severe forms of trafficking in persons; aliens in pending immigration proceedings

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Applications for T visas while in proceedings. Individuals who believe they are victims of severe forms of trafficking in persons and who are in pending immigration proceedings must inform DHS if they intend to apply for T nonimmigrant status under this section. With the concurrence of DHS counsel, a victim of a severe form of trafficking in persons in proceedings before an immigration judge or the Board of Immigration Appeals may request that the proceedings be administratively closed (or that a motion to reopen or motion to reconsider be indefinitely continued) in order to allow the alien to pursue an application for T nonimmigrant status with DHS. If the alien appears eligible for T nonimmigrant status, the immigration judge or the Board, whichever has jurisdiction, may grant such a request to administratively close the proceeding or continue a motion to reopen or motion to reconsider indefinitely. In the event DHS finds an alien ineligible for T-1 nonimmigrant status, DHS may recommence proceedings that have been administratively closed by filing a motion to re-calendar with the immigration court or a motion to reinstate with the Board. If the alien is in DHS custody pending the completion of immigration proceedings, DHS may continue to detain the alien until a decision has been rendered on the application. An alien who is in custody and requests bond or a bond redetermination will be governed by the provisions of part 236 of this chapter.

(b) Stay of final order of exclusion, deportation, or removal. A determination by DHS that an application for T-1 nonimmigrant status is bona fide automatically stays the execution of any final order of exclusion, deportation, or removal. This stay shall remain in effect until there is a final decision on the T application. The filing of an application for T nonimmigrant status does not stay the execution of a final order unless DHS has determined that the application is bona fide. Neither an immigration judge nor the Board of Immigration Appeals has jurisdiction to adjudicate an application for a stay of execution, deportation, or removal order, on the basis of the filing of an application for T nonimmigrant status.

[68 FR 9835, Feb. 28, 2003, as amended at 86 FR 70724, Dec, 13, 2021]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 7 cases, 2019–2020 · leading case: Yeison Meza Morales v. William Barr, 973 F.3d 656 (7th Cir. 2020).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Yeison Meza Morales v. William Barr, 973 F.3d 656 (7th Cir. 2020). · cites it 4× “8 C.F.R. § 1214.2 (a). What would be the point of such a specific regulation, the opinion posits, if the broader regulation at 8 C.”

Jesus Zuniga Romero v. William Barr, 937 F.3d 282 (4th Cir. 2019). · cites it 2× “, 8 C.F.R. § 1214.2 (a) (authorizing administrative closure for aliens who appear eligible for T non-immigrant status); 8 C.”

Roberto Hernandez-Serrano v. William Barr, 981 F.3d 459 (6th Cir. 2020). · cites it 2× “]” 8 C.F.R. § 1214.2 (a). All these regulations, Hernandez-Serrano contends, “presuppose” the existence of a general authority to close cases administratively under §§ 1003.”

Yeison Meza Morales v. William Barr (7th Cir. 2020). · cites it 4× “8 C.F.R. § 1214.2 (a). What would be the point of such a specific regulation, the opinion posits, if the broader regulation at 8 C.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.