8 C.F.R. § 215.3

Alien whose departure is deemed prejudicial to the interests of the United States

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The departure from the United States of any alien within one or more of the following categories shall be deemed prejudicial to the interests of the United States.

(a) Any alien who is in possession of, and who is believed likely to disclose to unauthorized persons, information concerning the plans, preparation, equipment, or establishments for the national defense and security of the United States.

(b) Any alien who seeks to depart from the United States to engage in, or who is likely to engage in, activities of any kind designed to obstruct, impede, retard, delay or counteract the effectiveness of the national defense of the United States or the measures adopted by the United States or the United Nations for the defense of any other country.

(c) Any alien who seeks to depart from the United States to engage in, or who is likely to engage in, activities which would obstruct, impede, retard, delay, or counteract the effectiveness of any plans made or action taken by any country cooperating with the United States in measures adopted to promote the peace, defense, or safety of the United States or such other country.

(d) Any alien who seeks to depart from the United States for the purpose of organizing, directing, or participating in any rebellion, insurrection, or violent uprising in or against the United States or a country allied with the United States, or of waging war against the United States or its allies, or of destroying, or depriving the United States of sources of supplies or materials vital to the national defense of the United States, or to the effectiveness of the measures adopted by the United States for its defense, or for the defense of any other country allied with the United States.

(e) Any alien who is subject to registration for training and service in the Armed Forces of the United States and who fails to present a Registration Certificate (SSS Form No. 2) showing that he has complied with his obligation to register under the Universal Military Training and Service Act, as amended.

(f) Any alien who is a fugitive from justice on account of an offense punishable in the United States.

(g) Any alien who is needed in the United States as a witness in, or as a party to, any criminal case under investigation or pending in a court in the United States: Provided, That any alien who is a witness in, or a party to, any criminal case pending in any criminal court proceeding may be permitted to depart from the United States with the consent of the appropriate prosecuting authority, unless such alien is otherwise prohibited from departing under the provisions of this part.

(h) Any alien who is needed in the United States in connection with any investigation or proceeding being, or soon to be, conducted by any official executive, legislative, or judicial agency in the United States or by any governmental committee, board, bureau, commission, or body in the United States, whether national, state, or local.

(i) Any alien whose technical or scientific training and knowledge might be utilized by an enemy or a potential enemy of the United States to undermine and defeat the military and defensive operations of the United States or of any nation cooperating with the United States in the interests of collective security.

(j) Any alien, where doubt exists whether such alien is departing or seeking to depart from the United States voluntarily except an alien who is departing or seeking to depart subject to an order issued in extradition, exclusion, or deportation proceedings.

(k) Any alien whose case does not fall within any of the categories described in paragraphs (a) to (j), inclusive, of this section, but which involves circumstances of a similar character rendering the alien's departure prejudicial to the interests of the United States.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1985–2021 · leading case: Esther Olowo v. John D. Ashcroft, United States Attorney Gen., 368 F.3d 692 (7th Cir. 2004).
Esther Olowo v. John D. Ashcroft, United States Attorney Gen., 368 F.3d 692 (7th Cir. 2004). “§ 1185 ; 8 C.F.R. § 215.3 , to prevent the child's parents from removing him to the Soviet Union.”
United States v. Domingo Pacheco-Poo, 952 F.3d 950 (8th Cir. 2020). · cites it 2× “See 2 The relevant part of 8 C.F.R. § 215.3 says a departure is prejudicial if it includes “[a]ny alien who is needed in the United States as a witness in, or as a party to, any criminal case under investigation or pending in a court in the United States[.”
J. Jesus Faustino Aguilar-Ayala v. Cecilio Ruiz, Etc., 973 F.2d 411 (5th Cir. 1992). “It argued that the plaintiffs were being detained, not under § 3144, but under the Immigration and Nationality Act (citing 8 C.F.R. 215.3(g)), *415 which, according to the government, allows for the detention of aliens for a period of up to six months following an order of…”
United States v. Trujillo-Alvarez, 900 F. Supp. 2d 1167 (D. Or. 2012). “” 8 C.F.R. § 215.3 (g). Thus, under existing INA regulations no alien shall depart from the United States while that alien is a defendant in a criminal case pending in a court in the United States.”
United States v. Ernesto Santos-Flores, 794 F.3d 1088 (9th Cir. 2015). “Nor need we reach the relevance, if any, of 8 C.F.R. § 215.3 (g), which provides that the departure from the United States of an alien who is needed as a party to a criminal case shall be *1092 deemed prejudicial to the interests of the United States.”
United States v. Boutin, 269 F. Supp. 3d 24 (E.D.N.Y 2017). “See 8 C.F.R. § 215.3 (g); see also United States v.”
Nwandu v. Crocetti, 8 F. App'x 162 (4th Cir. 2001). “WARNING: Pursuant to 8 CFR 215.3(a)(2), if your application for adjustment of status is denied, you will be subject to exclusion proceedings under Section 236 of the Immigration and Nationality Act.”
United States v. Resendiz-Guevara, 145 F. Supp. 3d 1128 (M.D. Fla. 2015). “” 8 C.F.R. § 215.3 (g). Some courts have been skeptical to rule that the departure-control mechanism may be utilized- to stop the removal of a person subject to an ICE detainer.”
United States v. Jorge Guadian-Salazar, 824 F.2d 344 (5th Cir. 1987). “3(g) (same as 8 C.F.R. § 215.3 (g)). Neither party has mentioned such regulations.”
Polovchak v. Meese, 774 F.2d 731 (7th Cir. 1985). · cites it 3× “” 8 C.F.R. § 215.3 (j). In October 1980, shortly after Walter was granted asylum, the Polovchaks filed this action in federal district court.”
United States v. John Dennis Tan Ong, 762 F. Supp. 2d 1353 (N.D. Ga. 2010). “Neither party has addressed 8 C.F.R. § 215.3 , which provides that "[t]he departure from the United States of any alien within one or more of the following categories shall be deemed prejudicial to the interests of the United States: .”
United States v. Baltazar-Sebastian, 990 F. 3d 939 (5th Cir. 2021). “8 C.F.R. § 215.3 (g). The departure is not prejudicial, however, if the “appropriate prosecuting authority” provides consent.”
— 8 C.F.R. § 215.3(a)(2) — 1 case
Nwandu v. Crocetti, 8 F. App'x 162 (4th Cir. 2001). “WARNING: Pursuant to 8 CFR 215.3(a)(2), if your application for adjustment of status is denied, you will be subject to exclusion proceedings under Section 236 of the Immigration and Nationality Act.”
— 8 C.F.R. § 215.3(g) — 1 case
J. Jesus Faustino Aguilar-Ayala v. Cecilio Ruiz, Etc., 973 F.2d 411 (5th Cir. 1992). “It argued that the plaintiffs were being detained, not under § 3144, but under the Immigration and Nationality Act (citing 8 C.F.R. 215.3(g)), *415 which, according to the government, allows for the detention of aliens for a period of up to six months following an order of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.