C.F.R. » Title 8 » CHAPTER I—DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY › SUBCHAPTER B—IMMIGRATION REGULATIONS › PART 244—TEMPORARY PROTECTED STATUS FOR NATIONALS OF DESIGNATED STATES

8 C.F.R. § 244.6

Application

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) An application for Temporary Protected Status (TPS) must be submitted in accordance with the form instructions, the applicable country-specific Federal Register notice that announces the procedures for TPS registration or re-registration and, except as otherwise provided in this section, with the appropriate fees as described in 8 CFR part 106.

(b) An applicant for TPS may also request an employment authorization document under 8 CFR part 274a by filing an Application for Employment Authorization in accordance with the form instructions and in accordance with 8 CFR 106.2 and 106.3.

[85 FR 46926, Aug. 3, 2020, as amended at 89 FR 6399, Jan. 31, 2024]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2009–2024 · leading case: Melgar v. Barr, 379 F. Supp. 3d 783 (D. Me. 2019).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Melgar v. Barr, 379 F. Supp. 3d 783 (D. Me. 2019). “See 8 C.F.R. § 244.6 ; 8 U.S.C. §§ 1182 (a), 1254a(c)(1)(A)(iii) (application requirements and grounds for inadmissibility).”
Bautista-perez v. Holder, 681 F. Supp. 2d 1083 (N.D. Cal. 2009). “§ 1254a(c)(l)(b); • invalidating those parts of 8 C.F.R. § 244.6 that requires Plaintiffs and other class members to pay biometric service fees; • enjoining DHS from imposing fees over $50.”
Nelson Edgardo Escalante-Ramires v. U.S. Attorney Gen. (11th Cir. 2024). “Gen- erally, a noncitizen meets the requirements for eligibility for TPS if he: (1) “has been continuously physically present in the United States since the effective date of the most recent designation” of the applicable country; (2) “has continuously resided in the United…”
Melgar v. Barr (D. Minnesota 2019). “See 8 C.F.R. § 244.6 ; 8 U.S.C. §§ 1182 (a), 1254a(c)(1)(A)(iii) (application requirements and grounds for inadmissibility).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.