C.F.R. » Title 8 » CHAPTER I—DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY › SUBCHAPTER B—IMMIGRATION REGULATIONS › PART 245—ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS TO THAT OF PERSON ADMITTED FOR PERMANENT RESIDENCE

8 C.F.R. § 245.9

[Reserved]

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1988–1998 · leading case: Lin Qi-Zhuo v. Doris Meissner, Comm'r, United States Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 70 F.3d 136 (D.C. Cir. 1995).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Lin Qi-Zhuo v. Doris Meissner, Comm'r, United States Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 70 F.3d 136 (D.C. Cir. 1995). · cites it 3× “8 C.F.R. § 245.9 (b)(6). The only other court to have directly addressed the application of § 245(a) to PRC nationals under the CSPA also concluded that “the CSPA is not inconsistent with 8 C.”
Lin v. Meissner, 855 F. Supp. 4 (D.D.C. 1994). · cites it 5× “INS interim rule, 8 C.F.R. § 245.9 (b)(6), 5 which plaintiff also challenges, supports defendant’s interpretation of the CSPA.”
Kai Wu Chan v. Reno, 916 F. Supp. 1289 (S.D.N.Y. 1996). · cites it 2× “issued “interim guidelines” for its application, including 8 C.F.R. § 245.9 . Regulation 245.9 interpreted the CSPA not to waive the requirement of inspection and admission or parole — the requirement generally required of any alien seeking status adjustment pursuant to Section…”
Pan v. Reno, 879 F. Supp. 18 (S.D.N.Y. 1995). · cites it 4× “The letter quoted 8 C.F.R. § 245.9 , which provides inter alia that “an alien is eligible to apply for adjustment of status under the provisions of [the CSPA] if the alien .”
Yeung v. Reno, 868 F. Supp. 53 (S.D.N.Y. 1994). · cites it 2× “” 8 C.F.R. § 245.9 (b)(6) (1994). Section 245 states that an “alien who was inspected and admitted or paroled into the United States” may apply for permanent resident status under certain specified conditions.”
Gee-Kwong Chan v. Reno, 922 F. Supp. 292 (N.D. Cal. 1996). · cites it 4× “Specifically, plaintiffs challenge the INS’s interpretation of section 245(i) in the INS’s adjudication of plaintiffs’ CSPA applications.”
Chan v. Reno, 991 F. Supp. 266 (S.D.N.Y. 1998). · cites it 3× “See 8 C.F.R. § 245.9 . This regulation required an applicant to establish “eligibility for adjustment of status under all provisions of section 245 of the [INA].”
Yu Xian Tang v. Reno, 77 F.3d 1194 (9th Cir. 1996). · cites it 5× “1 Tang challenges the promulgation and enforcement of 8 C.F.R. § 245.9 (b)(6). She asserts that it violates the Chinese Student Protection Act of 1992, 106 Stat.”
Dor v. Dist. Dir., Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., New York Dist., 697 F. Supp. 694 (S.D.N.Y. 1988). “” 8 CFR § 245.9 . It is not disputed however, that this issue has not been resolved in the first instance, in the administrative appellate body, the Administrative Appeals Unit, with jurisdiction for reviewing decisions of INS under IRCA.”
— 8 C.F.R. § 245.9(b)(6) — 2 cases
Lin v. Meissner, 855 F. Supp. 4 (D.D.C. 1994). “INS interim rule, 8 C.F.R. § 245.9 (b)(6), 5 which plaintiff also challenges, supports defendant’s interpretation of the CSPA.”
Pan v. Reno, 879 F. Supp. 18 (S.D.N.Y. 1995). “The letter quoted 8 C.F.R. § 245.9 , which provides inter alia that “an alien is eligible to apply for adjustment of status under the provisions of [the CSPA] if the alien .”
— 8 C.F.R. § 245.9(k) — 1 case
Chan v. Reno, 991 F. Supp. 266 (S.D.N.Y. 1998). “See 8 C.F.R. § 245.9 . This regulation required an applicant to establish “eligibility for adjustment of status under all provisions of section 245 of the [INA].”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.