(a) Examination. An alien arrested without a warrant of arrest under the authority contained in section 287(a)(2) of the Act will be examined by an officer other than the arresting officer. If no other qualified officer is readily available and the taking of the alien before another officer would entail unnecessary delay, the arresting officer, if the conduct of such examination is a part of the duties assigned to him or her, may examine the alien.
(b) Determination of proceedings. If the examining officer is satisfied that there is prima facie evidence that the arrested alien was entering, attempting to enter, or is present in the United States in violation of the immigration laws, the examining officer will refer the case to an immigration judge for further inquiry in accordance with 8 CFR parts 235, 239, or 240, order the alien removed as provided for in section 235(b)(1) of the Act and § 235.3(b) of this chapter, or take whatever other action may be appropriate or required under the laws or regulations applicable to the particular case.
(c) Notifications and information. Except in the case of an alien subject to the expedited removal provisions of section 235(b)(1)(A) of the Act, an alien arrested without warrant and placed in formal proceedings under section 238 or 240 of the Act will be advised of the reasons for his or her arrest and the right to be represented at no expense to the Government. The examining officer will provide the alien with a list of the available free legal services provided by organizations and attorneys qualified under 8 CFR part 1003 and organizations recognized under § 292.2 of this chapter or 8 CFR 1292.2 that are located in the district where the hearing will be held. The examining officer shall note on Form I-862 that such a list was provided to the alien. The officer will also advise the alien that any statement made may be used against him or her in a subsequent proceeding.
(d) Custody procedures. Unless voluntary departure has been granted pursuant to subpart C of 8 CFR part 240, a determination will be made within 48 hours of the arrest, except in the event of an emergency or other extraordinary circumstance in which case a determination will be made within an additional reasonable period of time, whether the alien will be continued in custody or released on bond or recognizance and whether a notice to appear and warrant of arrest as prescribed in 8 CFR parts 236 and 239 will be issued.
[62 FR 10390, Mar. 6, 1997, as amended at 66 FR 48335, Sept. 20, 2001; 68 FR 35276, June 13, 2003]
Notes of Decisions
Puc-Ruiz v. Holder (2010)
ca8 · cites it 8×
“3(a) requires that an alien arrested without a warrant and placed in removal proceedings be interviewed by an immigration officer other than the arresting officer, unless no other qualified officer is readily available and locating one would entail unnecessary delay.”
E-R-M-F- & A-S-M (2011)
bia · cites it 20×
“Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals Until an alien who is arrested without a warrant is placed in formal proceedings by the filing of a Notice to Appear (Form I-862), the regulation at 8 C.F.R. § 287.3 (c) (2011) does not…”
Gloria Esperanza Montero v. Immigration and Naturalization Service (1997)
ca2 · cites it 7×
“The BIA also determined that Montero was not arrested and interviewed by the same INS agent, in violation of 8 C.F.R. § 287.3 , and therefore concluded that the IJ properly declined to terminate Montero’s deportation proceeding on that ground.”
Oliva-Ramos v. Attorney General of the United States (2012)
ca3 · cites it 5×
“The BIA did not believe that Oliva-Ramos had established a violation of 8 C.F.R. §§ 287.3 (c) or 292.5(b) because he had been properly advised as required before formal removal proceedings were initiated.”
GARCIA-FLORES (1980)
bia · cites it 9×
“On appeal, the respondent contends that the immigration judge erred in denying her motion to suppress the evidence in question in view of the testimony of the Service investigator that he had not advised the respondent of her rights under 8 C.F.R. 287.3 and under the fifth…”
Gates v. Superior Court (1987)
calctapp · cites it 17×
“” 8 C.F.R. section 287.3, a subdivision of “Part 287 — Field Officers; Powers and Duties,” confers certain rights upon an alien arrested by the INS without a warrant pursuant to the authority contained in section 287(a)(2) of the INA ( 8 U.”
Samayoa-Martinez v. Holder (2009)
ca9 · cites it 4×
“B We next turn to Samayoa’s argument that the INS violated 8 C.F.R. § 287.3 (c) when the border patrol agent interviewed Samayoa on the telephone without first notifying him of his rights.”
Reno v. Flores (1993)
scotus · cites it 2×
“8 CFR § 287.3 (1992). If the examiner determines that "there is prima facie evidence establishing that the arrested alien is in the United States in violation of the immigration laws," ibid.”
United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal (1982)
scotus · cites it 2×
“8 CFR § 287.3 (1982). Aliens against whom such evidence exists may be granted immediate voluntary departure from the country.”
Rajah v. Mukasey (2008)
ca2 · cites it 3×
“3(a) Two of the petitioners — Najih and Rajah' — challenge rulings by the IJs that their rights under 8 C.F.R. § 287.3 (a) were not violated. Title 8 C.”
— 8 C.F.R. § 287.3(a) — 4 cases
Rajah v. Mukasey (2008)
ca2
“3(a) Two of the petitioners — Najih and Rajah' — challenge rulings by the IJs that their rights under 8 C.F.R. § 287.3 (a) were not violated. Title 8 C.”
— 8 C.F.R. § 287.3(b) — 1 case
— 8 C.F.R. § 287.3(d) — 2 cases
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.