(Repealed) Source: L. 99: Entire article added, p. 496, § 1, effective July 1. L. 2000: IP(1), (5), and
(6) amended, (2.5) added, and (19) repealed, pp. 1012, 1013, §§ 4, 5, 6, effective July 1; (16) and
(17) amended, p. 1538, § 5, effective July 1. L. 2002: (4) amended, p. 323, § 1, effective April 19; (9)(b) amended and (17.5) added, p. 491, § 1, effective July 1; (11) amended and (21) added, p. 1143, § 1, effective July 1. L. 2003: IP(1), (1)(c), (2), (3) to (9), (12), (13), (14), IP(15), (17.5), (18), and (21) amended, p. 996, § 2, effective July 1. L. 2004: (1), (5), (7), (8)(b), (8)(c), (9), (10), IP(15), (15)(e), and (20) amended and (1.5), (3.3), and (3.7) added, p. 545, § 2, effective July 1; (17.5)(b)(II) amended, p. 74, § 1, effective September 1. L. 2007: (1) amended and (15)(g) added, pp. 940, 941, §§ 1, 2, effective July 1. L. 2010: (15)(f.2) and (15)(f.4) added, (SB 10-080), ch. 78, p. 265, § 2, effective July 1; (17.5)(e)(III) amended, (HB 10-1422), ch. 419, p. 2068, § 22, effective August 11; (21)(a) and (21)(b) amended, (HB 10-1233), ch. 88, p. 296, § 4, effective August 11. L. 2013: (22) added, (SB 13-197), ch. 366, p. 2130, § 3, effective June 5; entire section repealed, (HB 13-1259), ch. 218, p. 1004, § 7, effective July 1.
Notes of Decisions
In Re the Marriage of Yates, 148 P.3d 304 (Colo. Ct. App. 2006).
· cites it 10× “Mutual Restraining Order Pursuant to § 13-14-102(3.3), C.R.S.2005, any district court, in an action commenced under the Uniform Dissolution of Marriage Act, shall have authority to issue temporary and permanent protection orders pursuant to § 13-14-102(1.”
In Re the Marriage of Fiffe, 140 P.3d 160 (Colo. Ct. App. 2005).
· cites it 21× “The statutory provisions at issue here, §§ 13-14-102 and 13-14-103, C.R.S.2005, are included in article 14, entitled Civil Protection Orders.”
People ex rel. D.W., 232 P.3d 182 (Colo. Ct. App. 2009).
· cites it 4× “To the contrary, the evidence suggests that D.W. was apologetic when the victim confronted him.”
People Ex Rel. Dw, 232 P.3d 182 (Colo. Ct. App. 2009).
· cites it 4× “To the contrary, the evidence suggests that D.W. was apologetic when the victim confronted him.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-14-102(1) — 1 case
In Re the Marriage of Fiffe, 140 P.3d 160 (Colo. Ct. App. 2005).
“The statutory provisions at issue here, §§ 13-14-102 and 13-14-103, C.R.S.2005, are included in article 14, entitled Civil Protection Orders.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-14-102(18) — 1 case
In Re the Marriage of Yates, 148 P.3d 304 (Colo. Ct. App. 2006).
“Mutual Restraining Order Pursuant to § 13-14-102(3.3), C.R.S.2005, any district court, in an action commenced under the Uniform Dissolution of Marriage Act, shall have authority to issue temporary and permanent protection orders pursuant to § 13-14-102(1.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-14-102(2) — 1 case
In Re the Marriage of Yates, 148 P.3d 304 (Colo. Ct. App. 2006).
“Mutual Restraining Order Pursuant to § 13-14-102(3.3), C.R.S.2005, any district court, in an action commenced under the Uniform Dissolution of Marriage Act, shall have authority to issue temporary and permanent protection orders pursuant to § 13-14-102(1.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-14-102(3) — 1 case
In Re the Marriage of Fiffe, 140 P.3d 160 (Colo. Ct. App. 2005).
“The statutory provisions at issue here, §§ 13-14-102 and 13-14-103, C.R.S.2005, are included in article 14, entitled Civil Protection Orders.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-14-102(4) — 1 case
In Re the Marriage of Yates, 148 P.3d 304 (Colo. Ct. App. 2006).
“Mutual Restraining Order Pursuant to § 13-14-102(3.3), C.R.S.2005, any district court, in an action commenced under the Uniform Dissolution of Marriage Act, shall have authority to issue temporary and permanent protection orders pursuant to § 13-14-102(1.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-14-102(4)(a) — 3 cases
In Re the Marriage of Fiffe, 140 P.3d 160 (Colo. Ct. App. 2005).
“The statutory provisions at issue here, §§ 13-14-102 and 13-14-103, C.R.S.2005, are included in article 14, entitled Civil Protection Orders.”
People ex rel. D.W., 232 P.3d 182 (Colo. Ct. App. 2009).
“To the contrary, the evidence suggests that D.W. was apologetic when the victim confronted him.”
People Ex Rel. Dw, 232 P.3d 182 (Colo. Ct. App. 2009).
“To the contrary, the evidence suggests that D.W. was apologetic when the victim confronted him.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-14-102(9)(a) — 1 case
In Re the Marriage of Fiffe, 140 P.3d 160 (Colo. Ct. App. 2005).
“The statutory provisions at issue here, §§ 13-14-102 and 13-14-103, C.R.S.2005, are included in article 14, entitled Civil Protection Orders.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.