Colorado Revised Statutes
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-16-111 (2026)
Recovery of costs of suit
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
A plaintiff who obtains judgment or an award of execution in an action brought under subsection (4) or (5) of rule 106 (a), C.R.C.P., shall recover his costs of suit. The defendant shall recover his costs if the action brought under subsection (4) or (5) of rule 106 (a), C.R.C.P., is dismissed pursuant to rule 41, C.R.C.P.
Source: R.S. p. 155, § 11. G.L. § 333. G.S. § 407. R.S. 08: § 1069. C.L. § 6585. CSA: C. 43, § 15. CRS 53: § 33-1-11. C.R.S. 1963: § 33-1-11.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1981–2007 · leading case: Rossmiller v. Romero, 625 P.2d 1029 (Colo. 1981).
Rossmiller v. Romero, 625 P.2d 1029 (Colo. 1981). “In reversing the trial court’s award of costs to the defendants in this case, the court of appeals relied on section 13-16-111, C.R.S. 1973, which states: “A plaintiff who obtains judgment or an award of execution in an action brought under subsection (4) or (5) of rule 106(a),…”
Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. City of Golden, 113 P.3d 119 (Colo. 2005). “2003), the court of appeals recognized the General Assembly’s intent to authorize such costs in the absence of an express provision where the general cost provision, section 13-16-111, C.R.S. (2004), was necessarily tied and applicable to public entities.”
Branch v. Colorado Dep't of Corr., 89 P.3d 496 (Colo. Ct. App. 2003). “54(d) and was not authorized under § 13-16-111, C.R.S.2003. However, the court noted a “certain unfairness in denying [plaintiff] and other successful inmate litigants reimbursement for their costs while, at the same time, allowing the state to recover its costs from the…”
Phillips v. Watkins, 166 P.3d 197 (Colo. Ct. App. 2007). “Plaintiff requested an award of costs pursuant to § 13-16-111, which provides as follows: A plaintiff who obtains judgment or an award of execution in an action brought under subsection (4) or (5) of rule 106(a), C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.