Colo. Rev. Stat. » Title 13
Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-22-222 (2026)

Confirmation of award

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) After a party to an arbitration proceeding receives notice of an award, the party may make a motion to the court for an order confirming the award at which time the court shall issue a confirming order unless the award is modified or corrected pursuant to section 13-22-220 or 13-22-224 or is vacated pursuant to section 13-22- 223.

(2) Repealed.

Source: L. 2004: Entire part R&RE, p. 1728, § 1, effective August 4. L. 2005: (2) repealed, p. 764, § 20, effective June 1.

Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 13-22-213 as it existed prior to 2004.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18 cases (6 in the last 5 years), 1978–2026 · leading case: In Re the Marriage of Roth, 2017 COA 45 (Colo. Ct. App. 2017).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re the Marriage of Roth, 2017 COA 45 (Colo. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 9× “” A week later, husband moved that the district court confirm the arbitrator’s award under section 13-22-222, C.R.S. 2016. A status conference was set to address the parties’ motions.”
In re the Marriage of Leverett, 318 P.3d 31 (Colo. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 16× “Wife had not asked the district court to confirm the arbitrator's awards pursuant to section 13-22-222(1), C.R.S8.2011 (detailing a proceeding by which a district court issues an order confirming an arbitrator's award).”
Coors Brewing Co. v. Cabo, 114 P.3d 60 (Colo. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 4× “154, § 13-22-213 at 576 (now recodified with amendments as § 13-22-222(1), C.R.S.2004); see also State Farm Mut.”
Est. of Guido v. Exempla, Inc., 292 P.3d 996 (Colo. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 14× “Laws 576 (now recodified with amendments as § 13-22-222(1), C.R.S.2011) ("Upon application of a party, the court shall confirm an award.”
Osborn v. Packard, 117 P.3d 77 (Colo. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 2× “154, § 13-22-213 at 576 (now reco-dified with amendments as § 13-22-222, C.R.S.2004). The court may only review an arbitration award based on the grounds enumerated in the relevant statutes.”
In re the Marriage of Rivera, 300 P.3d 994 (Colo. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 5× “1 10 Husband thereafter moved to confirm the arbitration award under section 13-22-222(1). His motion stressed that because neither party had timely sought to vacate, modify, or correct the arbitration award, the court was required to confirm it.”
Levy v. Am. Fam. Mut. Ins. Co., 293 P.3d 40 (Colo. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 2× “§ 13-22-222(1), C.R.S.2010 (emphasis added).”
Monatt v. Pioneer Astro Indus., Inc., 592 P.2d 1352 (Colo. Ct. App. 1979). · cites it 2× “However, the Act applies only to agreements made on or after July 14, 1975, § 13-22-222, C.R.S.1973 (1978 Cum.Supp.); Rhoads v.”
Rhoads v. Albertson's, Inc., 574 P.2d 114 (Colo. Ct. App. 1978). · cites it 3× “Section 13-22-222, C.R.S.1973 (1976 Cum.Supp.”
Ash Apts. v. Martinez, 656 P.2d 708 (Colo. Ct. App. 1982). · cites it 3× “We note initially that the Uniform Arbitration Act does not apply to the resolution of this controversy since the parties entered into the contract on April 1, 1973, and the Act applies only to agreements entered into on'or after July 14, 1975.”
Rooftop Restoration & Exteriors, Inc. v. Nautilus Ins. Co. (D. Colo. 2022). · cites it 3× “at ¶ 7 (citing Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-22-222 ).) According to Nautilus, under CUAA, “any effort to vacate the award would require a formidable showing and would have to be based upon very limited grounds.”
Marriage of Morales (Colo. Ct. App. 2026). · cites it 3× “¶6 Under section 13-22-222(1), C.R.S. 2025, of the Colorado Uniform Arbitration Act (CUAA), when a motion to confirm an arbitration award is made to the district court, “the court shall 2 issue a confirming order” unless it vacates the award under section 13-22-223.”
Show all 18 citing cases →
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-22-222(1) — 9 cases
In Re the Marriage of Roth, 2017 COA 45 (Colo. Ct. App. 2017). “” A week later, husband moved that the district court confirm the arbitrator’s award under section 13-22-222, C.R.S. 2016. A status conference was set to address the parties’ motions.”
In re the Marriage of Leverett, 318 P.3d 31 (Colo. Ct. App. 2012). “Wife had not asked the district court to confirm the arbitrator's awards pursuant to section 13-22-222(1), C.R.S8.2011 (detailing a proceeding by which a district court issues an order confirming an arbitrator's award).”
Est. of Guido v. Exempla, Inc., 292 P.3d 996 (Colo. Ct. App. 2012). “Laws 576 (now recodified with amendments as § 13-22-222(1), C.R.S.2011) ("Upon application of a party, the court shall confirm an award.”
Coors Brewing Co. v. Cabo, 114 P.3d 60 (Colo. Ct. App. 2004). “154, § 13-22-213 at 576 (now recodified with amendments as § 13-22-222(1), C.R.S.2004); see also State Farm Mut.”
In re the Marriage of Rivera, 300 P.3d 994 (Colo. Ct. App. 2013). “1 10 Husband thereafter moved to confirm the arbitration award under section 13-22-222(1). His motion stressed that because neither party had timely sought to vacate, modify, or correct the arbitration award, the court was required to confirm it.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-22-222(2) — 1 case
Coors Brewing Co. v. Cabo, 114 P.3d 60 (Colo. Ct. App. 2004). “154, § 13-22-213 at 576 (now recodified with amendments as § 13-22-222(1), C.R.S.2004); see also State Farm Mut.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.