Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-22-230 (2026)

Saving clause

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This part 2 shall not affect an action or proceeding commenced or a right accrued before this part 2 takes effect. Except as otherwise provided in section 13-22-203, an arbitration agreement made before August 4, 2004, is governed by the "Uniform Arbitration Act of 1975".

Source: L. 2004: Entire part R&RE, p. 1731, § 1, effective August 4.

PART 3

DISPUTE RESOLUTION ACT

Law reviews: For article, "The Mediation Alternative is Gaining Support in Colorado", see 13 Colo. Law. 589 (1984); for article, "Divorce Mediation: A Financial Perspective", see 13 Colo. Law. 1650 (1984); for article, "Enforcement of Arbitration Awards in Colorado", see 14 Colo. Law. 535 (1985); for article, "Litigation v. Alternative Dispute Resolution -- Let's Talk About It", see 17 Colo. Law. 655 (1988); for article, "Mediation Revisited: Amendments to the Colorado Dispute Resolution Act", see 17 Colo. Law. 1297 (1988); for article, "The 'Alternatives' in Alternative Dispute Resolution", see 18 Colo. Law. 1751 (1989); for several articles regarding the issue of the "Quality of dispute resolution", see 66 Den. U.L. Rev. 335-549 (1989); for numerous articles dealing with alternative dispute resolution (ADR), see 18 Colo. Law. 828-928 (1989); for article, "Court-ordered Mediation of Civil Cases", see 19 Colo. Law. 1057 (1990); for article, "The Growing Duty to Effectuate Settlement", see 20 Colo. Law. 453 (1991); for article, "New Rules on ADR: Professional Ethics, Shotguns and Fish", see 21 Colo. Law. 1877 (1992); for article, "Alternative Dispute Resolution in Colorado", see 22 Colo. Law. 1445 (1993); for article, "ADR: Important Options for Municipal Government", see 24 Colo. Law. 1279 (1995); for article, "Alternative Dispute Resolution Meets the Administrative Process", see 24 Colo. Law. 1549 (1995); for article, "Civil Mediation: Where, When and Why It Is Effective", see 24 Colo. Law. 1261 (1995); for article, "Alternative Dispute Resolution in Colorado", see 28 Colo. Law. 67 (Sept. 1999); for article, "The Mediation Privilege", see 29 Colo. Law. 65 (Nov. 2000); for article, "Mediating with Handkerchiefs: The New Model Standards for Divorce Mediation", see 31 Colo. Law. 69 (Jan. 2002); for article, "The Uniform Mediation Act: Its Potential Impact on Colorado Mediation Practice -- Part I", see 31 Colo. Law. 61 (May 2002); for article, "The Uniform Mediation Act: Its Potential Impact on Colorado Mediation Practice -- Part II", see 31 Colo. Law. 67 (June 2002); for article, "The Uniform Mediation Act: Its Potential Impact on Colorado Mediation Practice -- Part III", see 31 Colo. Law. 101 (July 2002); for article, "Colorado Law on Mediation: A Primer", see 35 Colo. Law. 21 (Mar. 2006); for article, "Complex Confidentiality Issues in Mediation", see 44 Colo. Law. 23 (Jan. 2015); for article, "Good Faith and the Duty of Disclosure", see 44 Colo. Law. 41 (Aug. 2015); for article, "Mediating the Interactive Process", see 46 Colo. Law. 35 (May 2017); for article, "Online Dispute Resolution -- A Digital Door to Justice or Pandora's Box? Part 3", 49 Colo. Law. 26 (Apr. 2020); for article, "Unlocking Apology's Potential in Resolving Disputes", see 51 Colo. Law. 20 (July 2022); for article, "Managing High-Conflict Dissolutions in Mediation and Court", see 51 Colo. Law. 18 (Aug.-Sept. 2022); for article, "The Benefits of Promoting Party Self-Determination in Mediation", see 51 Colo. Law. 12 (Oct. 2022).

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 2012–2012 · leading case: Est. of Guido v. Exempla, Inc., 292 P.3d 996 (Colo. Ct. App. 2012).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Est. of Guido v. Exempla, Inc., 292 P.3d 996 (Colo. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 2× “See § 13-22-230, C.R.S. 2011 ("an arbitration agreement made before August 4, 2004, is governed by the Uniform Arbitration Act of 1975").”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.