As used in this article, unless the context otherwise requires:
(1) "Clerk" and "clerk of the court" include any deputy clerk or the jury commissioner.
(2) "Court" means a district or county court of this state and includes any judge of the court.
(2.5) "Juror service" means the period of time during which a person is committed to serving upon a jury, from the time the person reports and checks in on his or her designated reporting date through and until he or she is released by the court or by the jury commissioner. "Juror service" includes any time that a person spends in the jury selection process and any time that a person spends in a trial.
(3) "Juror wheel" means any electronic automated system for the storage of the names or identifying numbers of prospective jurors.
(4) "Master juror list" means the voter registration lists for the county, which shall be supplemented with names from other sources prescribed pursuant to section 13-71-107 in order to foster the policy and protect the rights secured by this article.
(5) "Master juror wheel" means the juror wheel in which are placed names or identifying numbers of prospective jurors taken from the master list.
(6) "Voter registration lists" means the official records of persons registered to vote in the most recent general election.
Source: L. 89: Entire article R&RE, p. 765, § 1, effective January 1, 1990. L. 2011:
(2.5) added, (HB 11-1153), ch. 70, p. 189, § 1, effective August 10.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 13-71-104 as it existed prior to 1989.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
9
cases, 1978–1995 · leading case:
People v. Sepeda, 581 P.2d 723 (Colo. 1978).
People v. Sepeda, 581 P.2d 723 (Colo. 1978).
· cites it 8× “" Section 13-71-102, C.R.S. 1973. [8] We note that after the announcement of the Cornelison decision the legislature changed the law relating to the affirmative defense of intoxication.”
Cerrone v. People, 900 P.2d 45 (Colo. 1995).
· cites it 14× “A We note that section 13-71-103 must be read in light of section 13-71-102, also in effect during the time at issue here, which states: It is the policy of this state that all persons selected for jury service shall be selected at random from a fair cross section of the…”
People v. Cerrone, 867 P.2d 143 (Colo. Ct. App. 1993).
· cites it 10× “This provision should be read in the context of the broader legislative policy that is presented in § 13-71-102, C.R.S. (1987 Repl. Vol. 6A) also in effect at the time at issue here.”
People v. Cerrone, 854 P.2d 178 (Colo. 1993).
· cites it 2× “” Section 13-71-102, 6A C.R.S. (1987); 1 see also People v.”
People v. Cerrone, 829 P.2d 468 (Colo. Ct. App. 1992).
· cites it 4× “” Section 13-71-102, C.R.S. (1987 Repl.Vol.”
Aurora by & on Behalf of People v. Rhodes, 689 P.2d 603 (Colo. 1984).
· cites it 2× “Citing section 13-71-102, 6 C.R.S. (1973), which provides that "all persons selected for jury service shall be selected at random from a fair cross section of the population of the area served by the court," the court ruled that the "area served by the court" meant the entire…”
City of Aurora ex rel. People v. Rhodes, 689 P.2d 603 (Colo. 1984).
· cites it 2× “Citing section 13-71-102, 6 C.R.S. (1973), which provides that “all persons selected for jury service shall be selected at random from a fair cross section of the population of the area served by the court,” the court ruled that the “area served by the court” meant the entire…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.