Colo. Rev. Stat. » Title 13
Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-71-112 (2026)

Emergency summonses

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

In order to meet emergency needs of the court, the state court administrator or a jury commissioner, by any means of notice including notice by telephone, may summon additional trial or grand jurors to appear for juror service at a time certain and shall inform the juror at which courthouse to appear.

Source: L. 89: Entire article R&RE, p. 768, § 1, effective January 1, 1990.

Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 13-71-110 (4) as it existed prior to 1989.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1983–1996 · leading case: People v. Rodriguez, 914 P.2d 230 (Colo. 1996).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
People v. Rodriguez, 914 P.2d 230 (Colo. 1996). · cites it 8× “For example, Rodriguez alleges that the jury commissioner excused jurors who merely stated that they were students, were over sixty with medical problems, or who asserted vacation hardships without requiring a showing that jury service would cause "undue hardship, extreme…”
People ex rel. Faulk v. Dist. Court of the Eleventh Jud. Dist. of Colorado, 667 P.2d 1384 (Colo. 1983). · cites it 9× “Section 13-71-112(2), C.R.S.1973. Jury service being an obligation of citizenship, the court should not excuse a person otherwise qualified for jury service for any reason short of the statutory criteria of “undue hardship, extreme inconvenience, or public necessity” set out in…”
People v. Reese, 670 P.2d 11 (Colo. Ct. App. 1983). · cites it 3× “Section 13-71-112(1), C.R.S.1973, provides that a court may excuse a juror for “undue hardship.”
People v. Cerrone, 867 P.2d 143 (Colo. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 4× “See § 13-71-112(2), C.R.S. (1987 Repl.Vol. 6A) (court, on its own initiative, may excuse juror for undue hardship); People v.”
Cerrone v. People, 900 P.2d 45 (Colo. 1995). · cites it 2× “§ 13-71-112(2), 6A C.R.S. *56 (1987) [15] .”
Peo. Ex Rel. Faulk v. Dist. Ct. of 11th Jud., 667 P.2d 1384 (Colo. 1983). · cites it 9× “Section 13-71-112(2), C.R.S.1973. Jury service being an obligation of citizenship, the court should not excuse a person otherwise qualified for jury service for any reason short of the statutory criteria of "undue hardship, extreme inconvenience, or public necessity" set out in…”
The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant v. Frank D. RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee., 914 P.2d 230 (Colo. 1996). · cites it 4× “For example, Rodriguez alleges that the jury commissioner excused jurors who merely stated that they were students, were over sixty with medical problems, or who asserted vacation hardships without requiring a showing that jury service would cause "undue hardship, extreme…”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-71-112(1) — 1 case
People v. Reese, 670 P.2d 11 (Colo. Ct. App. 1983). “Section 13-71-112(1), C.R.S.1973, provides that a court may excuse a juror for “undue hardship.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-71-112(2) — 5 cases
People v. Rodriguez, 914 P.2d 230 (Colo. 1996). “For example, Rodriguez alleges that the jury commissioner excused jurors who merely stated that they were students, were over sixty with medical problems, or who asserted vacation hardships without requiring a showing that jury service would cause "undue hardship, extreme…”
People ex rel. Faulk v. Dist. Court of the Eleventh Jud. Dist. of Colorado, 667 P.2d 1384 (Colo. 1983). “Section 13-71-112(2), C.R.S.1973. Jury service being an obligation of citizenship, the court should not excuse a person otherwise qualified for jury service for any reason short of the statutory criteria of “undue hardship, extreme inconvenience, or public necessity” set out in…”
People v. Cerrone, 867 P.2d 143 (Colo. Ct. App. 1993). “See § 13-71-112(2), C.R.S. (1987 Repl.Vol. 6A) (court, on its own initiative, may excuse juror for undue hardship); People v.”
Cerrone v. People, 900 P.2d 45 (Colo. 1995). “§ 13-71-112(2), 6A C.R.S. *56 (1987) [15] .”
Peo. Ex Rel. Faulk v. Dist. Ct. of 11th Jud., 667 P.2d 1384 (Colo. 1983). “Section 13-71-112(2), C.R.S.1973. Jury service being an obligation of citizenship, the court should not excuse a person otherwise qualified for jury service for any reason short of the statutory criteria of "undue hardship, extreme inconvenience, or public necessity" set out in…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.