Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 14-15-102 (2026)

Legislative declaration

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The general assembly declares that the public policy of this state, as set forth in section 31 of article II of the state constitution, recognizes only the union of one man and one woman as a marriage. The general assembly declares that the purpose of this article is to provide eligible couples the opportunity to obtain the benefits, protections, and responsibilities afforded by Colorado law to spouses consistent with the principles of equality under law and religious freedom embodied in both the United States constitution and the constitution of this state. The general assembly declares that a second purpose of the act is to protect individuals who are or may become partners in a civil union against discrimination in employment, housing, and in places of public accommodation. The general assembly further finds that the general assembly, in the exercise of its plenary power, has the authority to define other arrangements, such as a civil union between two unmarried persons regardless of their gender, and to set forth in statute any state-level benefits, rights, and protections to which a couple is entitled by virtue of entering into a civil union. The general assembly finds that the "Colorado Civil Union Act" does not alter the public policy of this state, which recognizes only the union of one man and one woman as a marriage. The general assembly also declares that a third purpose in enacting the "Colorado Civil Union Act" is to state that Colorado courts may offer same-sex couples the equal protection of the law and to give full faith and credit to recognize relationships legally created in other jurisdictions that are similar to civil unions created by this article and that are not otherwise recognized pursuant to Colorado law.

Source: L. 2013: Entire article added, (SB 13-011), ch. 49, p. 147, § 1, effective May 1.

Cross references: For the validity or recognition of marriages in this state, see section 31 of article II of the state constitution.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2013–2021 · leading case: In re Marriage of Hogsett & Neale, 2021 CO 1 (Colo. 2021).
In re Marriage of Hogsett & Neale, 2021 CO 1 (Colo. 2021). · cites it 4× “It was not until 2008 that LGBTQ Coloradans found protection in state law from discrimination in employment, housing, and public accommodations, see § 14-15-102, C.R.S. (2020), and not until the Designated Beneficiaries Agreements Act of 2009 that same-sex relationships were…”
In re the Marriage of Edi L. HOGSETT v. Marcia E. NEALE, 478 P.3d 713 (Colo. 2021). · cites it 4× “" § 14-15-102, C.R.S. ( 2020 ) . ¶53 Given this reality, the refined test emphasizes the importance of the parties ' mutual agreement to enter a marital relationship.”
In re Marriage of LaFleur & Pyfer, 2021 CO 3 (Colo. 2021). · cites it 2× “(2009), and civil unions, § 14-15-102, C.R.S. (2013), these alternatives fell short of providing same-sex couples access to marriage on the same terms as different-sex couples.”
In re the Marriage of Dean LAFLEUR v. Timothy PYFER, 479 P.3d 869 (Colo. 2021). · cites it 2× “( 2009 ) , and civil unions, § 14-15-102, C.R.S. ( 2013 ) , these alternatives fell short of providing same-sex couples access to marriage on the same terms as different-sex couples.”
Griego v. Oliver, 2014 NMSC 003 (N.M. 2013). “See Colo. Rev. Stat. §§ 14-15-102 to -119 (2013); 750 111.”
Griego v. Oliver, 2014 NMSC 3 (N.M. 2013). “See Colo. Rev. Stat. §§ 14-15-102 to -119 (2013); 750 Ill.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.