Colo. Rev. Stat. » Title 15
Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 15-11-801 (2026)

Disclaimer of property interests

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(Repealed)

Source: L. 94: Entire part R&RE, p. 1024, § 3, effective July 1, 1995. L. 95: (4) amended, p. 360, § 13, effective July 1. L. 2011: Entire section repealed, (SB 11-166), ch. 203, p. 868, § 2, effective August 10.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1976–2012 · leading case: Matter of the Est. of Colacci, 549 P.2d 1096 (Colo. Ct. App. 1976).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Matter of the Est. of Colacci, 549 P.2d 1096 (Colo. Ct. App. 1976). · cites it 2× “NOTES [1] Now repealed, but see § 15-11-801, C.R.S. 1973, to the same effect.”
Dyer v. Eckols, 808 S.W.2d 531 (Tex. App. 1991). “Code §§ 275, 282(a) (West 1991); Colo.Rev.Stat. §§ 15-11-801(1), 15-11 — 801(3) (1987); Conn.”
United States v. Davidson, 55 F. Supp. 2d 1152 (D. Colo. 1999). · cites it 2× “§ 15-11-801 allowed a potential beneficiary to renounce and disclaim any interest in property that is bequeathed by will.”
Beren v. Goodyear (In re Est. of Beren), 412 P.3d 487 (Colo. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 2× “Analysis ¶ 163 Here, Goodyear's distribution plan provided that the estate should be distributed pro rata to the seven children as residual beneficiaries, "subject to a corporate governance structure intended to assure that neither of what has turned out to be the two 'sides' of…”
Grasseschi v. Smiley, 776 P.2d 1136 (Colo. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 7× “He argues that because § 15-11-207 provides no specific procedure for renouncing a trust, the procedures detailed in § 15-11-801, C.R.S. (1987 Repl. Vol. 6B) and/or § 15-1-901, C.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 15-11-801(1) — 2 cases
Dyer v. Eckols, 808 S.W.2d 531 (Tex. App. 1991). “Code §§ 275, 282(a) (West 1991); Colo.Rev.Stat. §§ 15-11-801(1), 15-11 — 801(3) (1987); Conn.”
Grasseschi v. Smiley, 776 P.2d 1136 (Colo. Ct. App. 1989). “He argues that because § 15-11-207 provides no specific procedure for renouncing a trust, the procedures detailed in § 15-11-801, C.R.S. (1987 Repl. Vol. 6B) and/or § 15-1-901, C.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 15-11-801(4) — 1 case
Beren v. Goodyear (In re Est. of Beren), 412 P.3d 487 (Colo. Ct. App. 2012). “Analysis ¶ 163 Here, Goodyear's distribution plan provided that the estate should be distributed pro rata to the seven children as residual beneficiaries, "subject to a corporate governance structure intended to assure that neither of what has turned out to be the two 'sides' of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.