Colorado Revised Statutes
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 16-11-202 (2026)
Probationary power of court
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(Repealed)
Source: L. 72: R&RE, p. 242, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 39-11-202. L. 94: Entire section amended, p. 97, § 1, effective July 1. L. 96: Entire section amended, p. 739, § 14, effective July 1. L. 99: (1) amended, p. 57, § 9, effective March 15. L. 2002: Entire section repealed, p. 1463, § 3, effective October 1.
Editor's note: In 2002, this section was relocated to section 18-1.3-202.
Cross references: For the legislative declaration contained in the 2002 act repealing this section, see section 1 of chapter 318, Session Laws of Colorado 2002.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 42
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1976–2025 · leading case: Faulkner v. Dist. Court of Eighteenth Jud. Dist., 826 P.2d 1277 (Colo. 1992).
Faulkner v. Dist. Court of Eighteenth Jud. Dist., 826 P.2d 1277 (Colo. 1992). “Internment in a county jail as a condition to probation is authorized by section 16-11-202, 8A C.R.S. (1986): When it appears to the satisfaction of the court that the ends of justice and the best interest of the public, as well as the defendant, will be served thereby, the…”
People v. Ray, 560 P.2d 74 (Colo. 1977). “Section 16-11-202, C.R.S.1973 sets forth: " XX-XX-XXX.”
People v. Garberding, 787 P.2d 154 (Colo. 1990). “The defendant Andrew Garberding appeals from the trial court’s imposition of a sentence of 18 months in a work release program, pursuant to sections 16-11-202 and 16-11-212, 8A C.R.”
People v. Kennaugh, 80 P.3d 315 (Colo. 2003). “In Flenniken we concluded, in direct opposition to today's holding, that "[n]either that section [§ 16-11-202] nor section 16-11-101(1)(a) (listing probation as an alternative sentence) expressly refers to section 18-1-105 as limiting the period of probation that may be ordered.”
People v. Bassford, 343 P.3d 1003 (Colo. Ct. App. 2014). “As it does today, the probation statute allowed that: In addition to imposing other conditions, the court has the power to commit the defendant to any jail operated by the county or city and county in which the offense was committed during such time or for such intervals within…”
People v. Steen, 318 P.3d 487 (Colo. 2014). “8-202(1) regarding stays of probation was adopted in 1994 as an amendment to section 16-11-202. See House Bill 94-1068, 1994 Colo.”
People v. Trujillo, 261 P.3d 485 (Colo. Ct. App. 2010). “But, the division noted, this situation had been changed by the recent amendment to section 16-11-202 (now codified as section 18-1.”
People v. Burleigh, 727 P.2d 873 (Colo. Ct. App. 1986). “” Section 16-11-202, C.R.S. (1978 Repl. Vol.”
People v. Appelhanz, 738 P.2d 1182 (Colo. 1987). “The defendant contends that we should characterize the trial court’s action as a grant of probation, and find the sentence to be legal under the general probation statute, section 16-11-202, 8A C.R.S. (1986). 6 We decline to adopt this reasoning.”
People v. Herr, 868 P.2d 1121 (Colo. Ct. App. 1993). “8A) and are expressly subject to the limitations on the length of imprisonment set out in § 18-1-105, C.”
People v. Turner, 644 P.2d 951 (Colo. 1982). “Section 16-11-202, C.R.S.1973 (1978 Repl.”
People v. Richards, 795 P.2d 1343 (Colo. Ct. App. 1989). “See § 16-11-202, C.R.S. (1986 Repl.Vol. 8A); People v.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 16-11-202(1) — 5 cases
People v. Kennaugh, 80 P.3d 315 (Colo. 2003). “In Flenniken we concluded, in direct opposition to today's holding, that "[n]either that section [§ 16-11-202] nor section 16-11-101(1)(a) (listing probation as an alternative sentence) expressly refers to section 18-1-105 as limiting the period of probation that may be ordered.”
People v. Widhalm, 991 P.2d 291 (Colo. Ct. App. 1999).
People v. Benavidez, 58 P.3d 1142 (Colo. Ct. App. 2002).
People v. Fleming, 3 P.3d 449 (Colo. Ct. App. 1999).
People v. Martinnillie, 940 P.2d 1090 (Colo. Ct. App. 1996).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.