Colo. Rev. Stat. » Title 16
Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 16-13-211 (2026)

Findings of fact and conclusions of law

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(Repealed) Source: L. 72: R&RE, p. 258, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 39-13-211. L. 2002: Entire section repealed, p. 1463, § 3, effective October 1.

Editor's note: In 2002, this section was relocated to § 18-1.3-912.

Cross references: For the legislative declaration contained in the 2002 act repealing this section, see section 1 of chapter 318, Session Laws of Colorado 2002.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1983–2020 · leading case: People v. White, 656 P.2d 690 (Colo. 1983).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
People v. White, 656 P.2d 690 (Colo. 1983). · cites it 4× “The court found the defendant to be a sex offender and also fourid that, beyond a reasonable doubt, he constituted a threat of bodily harm to the public pursuant to section 16-13-211(2), C.R.S.1973 (1978 Repl.”
Christensen v. People, 869 P.2d 1256 (Colo. 1994). “See § 16-13-211 (invoking mandatory language); see also People v.”
People v. Kibel, 701 P.2d 37 (Colo. 1985). · cites it 2× “§ 16-13-211, 8 C.R.S. (1978). Six months following this commitment, and every twelve months thereafter, the state parole board (board) must “review all reports, records, and information” concerning the defendant.”
People v. Adrian, 701 P.2d 45 (Colo. 1985). “The district court found beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant constituted a threat of bodily harm to members of the public, § 16-13-211, 8 C.R.S. (1978), and committed the defendant to the custody of the Department of Corrections, 3 designating the Colorado State…”
State v. Harris, 463 N.W.2d 829 (Neb. 1990). “See, also, Colo. Rev. Stat. § 16-13-211 (1990) (beyond a reasonable doubt), and Colo.”
Wimberly v. Williams (D. Colo. 2020). “Moreover, a court already has determined, prior to commitment, that the sex offender constitutes a danger to society beyond a reasonable doubt, § 16-13-211(2); the parole board therefore does not make an initial determination of dangerousness, but rather is called upon only to…”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 16-13-211(2) — 3 cases
People v. White, 656 P.2d 690 (Colo. 1983). “The court found the defendant to be a sex offender and also fourid that, beyond a reasonable doubt, he constituted a threat of bodily harm to the public pursuant to section 16-13-211(2), C.R.S.1973 (1978 Repl.”
People v. Kibel, 701 P.2d 37 (Colo. 1985). “§ 16-13-211, 8 C.R.S. (1978). Six months following this commitment, and every twelve months thereafter, the state parole board (board) must “review all reports, records, and information” concerning the defendant.”
Wimberly v. Williams (D. Colo. 2020). “Moreover, a court already has determined, prior to commitment, that the sex offender constitutes a danger to society beyond a reasonable doubt, § 16-13-211(2); the parole board therefore does not make an initial determination of dangerousness, but rather is called upon only to…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.