Colo. Rev. Stat. » Title 16
Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 16-18.5-103 (2026)

Assessment of restitution - corrective orders

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(Repealed)

Source: L. 2000: Entire article added, p. 1032, § 1, effective September 1. L. 2002: (7) added, p. 422, § 4, effective July 1; entire section repealed, p. 1463, § 3, effective October 1. Editor's note: House Bill 02-1258 enacted subsection (7). This section as amended by House Bill 02-1258 was subsequently harmonized with House Bill 02-1046 and relocated to section 18-1.3-603.

Cross references: For the legislative declaration contained in the 2002 act repealing this section, see section 1 of chapter 318, Session Laws of Colorado 2002.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2002–2026 · leading case: v. Gregory, 2019 COA 184 (Colo. Ct. App. 2019).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
v. Gregory, 2019 COA 184 (Colo. Ct. App. 2019). “1, § 16-18.5-103, 2000 Colo. Sess. Laws 1032 , as recognized in People v.”
Sanoff v. People, 187 P.3d 576 (Colo. 2008). · cites it 2× “In particular, section 16-18.5-103(1), now codified at § 18-1.”
People v. Garcia, 55 P.3d 243 (Colo. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 6× “Specifically, she argues that the court violated her right to protection against ex post facto application of the law by imposing the twelve-percent interest rate under § 16-18.5-103, Alternatively, she argues that the rule of lenity requires that the interest rate be set at…”
Farmers Ins. Exch. v. Mills (In Re Mills), 290 B.R. 822 (Bankr.D. Colo. 2003). · cites it 7× “*831 § 16-18.5-103 which was renumbered to Colo Rev.”
People v. Lowe, 60 P.3d 753 (Colo. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 2× “The 1992 order was not an “order for restitution made pursuant to [§ 16-18.5-103].” Thus, the provisions quoted above for interest, attorney fees, and the like do not apply to him.”
People v. Harman, 97 P.3d 290 (Colo. Ct. App. 2004). “2003 (emphasis added)(formerly codified as § 16-18.5-103(l)-(2)). Defendant appears to argue that because the restitution act states restitution “shall” be determined within ninety days unless good cause is shown, the court had no statutory authority to order restitution later,…”
Olson v. McNabb (In Re McNabb), 287 B.R. 820 (Bankr.D. Colo. 2003). · cites it 2× “Therefore, § 523(a)(7), by its express language, is not applicable to Plaintiffs and they may not utilize it to except the debt the Defendant owes to them from discharge.”
People v. Rockne, 315 P.3d 172 (Colo. Ct. App. 2012). “1, § 16-18.5-103, 2000 Colo. Sess. Laws 1082 (relocated in 2002 (Ch.”
People v. Trujillo, 75 P.3d 1133 (Colo. Ct. App. 2003). “2002 (formerly § 16-18.5-103(1)(d)). - "Restitution," as applicable here, is defined as: any pecuniary loss suffered by a victim, and includes but is not limited to all out-of-pocket expenses, interest, loss of use of money, anticipated future expenses, rewards paid by victims,…”
People v. Stovall, 75 P.3d 1165 (Colo. Ct. App. 2003). “2002 (formerly § 16-18.5-103(1)). The court found that, while it "would never desire to flout the authority of the legislature .”
People v. Roberts, 114 P.3d 75 (Colo. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 2× “2004 (formerly § 16-18.5-103), requires a court, inter alia, to order the defendant to pay a specific amount of restitution.”
Peo v. Jacobson (Colo. Ct. App. 2025). “1, § 16-18.5-103, 2000 Colo. Sess. Laws 1032 (relocated in 2002 (Ch.”
Show all 13 citing cases →
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 16-18.5-103(1) — 3 cases
Sanoff v. People, 187 P.3d 576 (Colo. 2008). “In particular, section 16-18.5-103(1), now codified at § 18-1.”
People v. Stovall, 75 P.3d 1165 (Colo. Ct. App. 2003). “2002 (formerly § 16-18.5-103(1)). The court found that, while it "would never desire to flout the authority of the legislature .”
People v. Marceleno (Colo. Ct. App. 2026).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 16-18.5-103(1)(d) — 1 case
People v. Trujillo, 75 P.3d 1133 (Colo. Ct. App. 2003). “2002 (formerly § 16-18.5-103(1)(d)). - "Restitution," as applicable here, is defined as: any pecuniary loss suffered by a victim, and includes but is not limited to all out-of-pocket expenses, interest, loss of use of money, anticipated future expenses, rewards paid by victims,…”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 16-18.5-103(4)(a) — 1 case
Farmers Ins. Exch. v. Mills (In Re Mills), 290 B.R. 822 (Bankr.D. Colo. 2003). “*831 § 16-18.5-103 which was renumbered to Colo Rev.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 16-18.5-103(4)(b) — 2 cases
People v. Lowe, 60 P.3d 753 (Colo. Ct. App. 2002). “The 1992 order was not an “order for restitution made pursuant to [§ 16-18.5-103].” Thus, the provisions quoted above for interest, attorney fees, and the like do not apply to him.”
People v. Roberts, 114 P.3d 75 (Colo. Ct. App. 2005). “2004 (formerly § 16-18.5-103), requires a court, inter alia, to order the defendant to pay a specific amount of restitution.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 16-18.5-103(4)(d) — 1 case
Olson v. McNabb (In Re McNabb), 287 B.R. 820 (Bankr.D. Colo. 2003). “Therefore, § 523(a)(7), by its express language, is not applicable to Plaintiffs and they may not utilize it to except the debt the Defendant owes to them from discharge.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 16-18.5-103(l) — 1 case
People v. Harman, 97 P.3d 290 (Colo. Ct. App. 2004). “2003 (emphasis added)(formerly codified as § 16-18.5-103(l)-(2)). Defendant appears to argue that because the restitution act states restitution “shall” be determined within ninety days unless good cause is shown, the court had no statutory authority to order restitution later,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.