Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 17-22.5-103 (2026)

Computation of time

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

No inmate shall be discharged from the department until he has remained the full term for which he was sentenced, to be computed on and after the day on which he was received into the same and excluding any time the inmate may have been at large by reason of escape therefrom, unless he is pardoned or otherwise released by legal authority.

Source: L. 84: Entire article R&RE, p. 517, § 1, effective July 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1989–2013 · leading case: Martin v. People, 27 P.3d 846 (Colo. 2001).
Martin v. People, 27 P.3d 846 (Colo. 2001). · cites it 5× “14, § 17-22.5-103, 1979 Colo. Sess. Laws 662 , 667-68.”
Bynum v. Kautzky, 784 P.2d 735 (Colo. 1989). “197, § 3, § 17-22.5-103, 1981 Colo. Sess.Laws 941, 943, and in 1984.”
People v. Jackson, 109 P.3d 1017 (Colo. Ct. App. 2004). “423, § 17-22.5-103(9) at 2677-79, 2680) (§ 17-22.”
Ryals v. City of Englewood, 962 F. Supp. 2d 1236 (D. Colo. 2013). “The only state statute directly governing sex offender residency is § 17-22.5-103 which, both in subsections (6) and (8), requires that for sex offenders who are granted parole, “the division of adult parole shall provide parole supervision and assistance in securing employment,…”
Crater v. Furlong, 884 P.2d 1127 (Colo. 1994). · cites it 2× “Section 17-22.5-103, 8A C.R.S. (1986), provides: 17-22.”
Koucherik v. Zavaras, 940 P.2d 1063 (Colo. Ct. App. 1996). “” is required to serve seventy-five percent of the sentence, and no earned time is applicable.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 17-22.5-103(3) — 1 case
Koucherik v. Zavaras, 940 P.2d 1063 (Colo. Ct. App. 1996). “” is required to serve seventy-five percent of the sentence, and no earned time is applicable.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 17-22.5-103(9) — 1 case
People v. Jackson, 109 P.3d 1017 (Colo. Ct. App. 2004). “423, § 17-22.5-103(9) at 2677-79, 2680) (§ 17-22.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.