Colorado Revised Statutes
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-18-101 (2026)
Short title
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
This article shall be known and may be cited as the "Uniform Controlled Substances Act of 2013".
Source: L. 92: Entire article R&RE, p. 324, § 1, effective July 1. L. 2013: Entire section amended, (SB 13-250), ch. 333, p. 1907, § 6, effective October 1.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12
cases, 1984–2016 · leading case: People v. Frantz, 114 P.3d 34 (Colo. Ct. App. 2005).
People v. Frantz, 114 P.3d 34 (Colo. Ct. App. 2005). “See § 18-18-101, C.R.S.2003; see also United States v.”
People v. Cagle, 751 P.2d 614 (Colo. 1988). “): “The general assembly hereby finds, determines, and declares that the strict control of controlled substances in this state is necessary for the immediate and future preservation of the public peace, health, and safety.” We are not convinced that the General Assembly’s…”
Vega v. People, 893 P.2d 107 (Colo. 1995). “9 The special offender provision was added to the Controlled Substance Act, sections 18-18-101 to -109, 8B C.R.S. (1986) (repealed and reenacted at sections 18-18-101 to -605, 8B C.”
People v. Lucero, 2016 COA 105 (Colo. Ct. App. 2016). “1, §§ 18-18-101 to -605, 1992 Colo. Sess. Laws 324 -85; Unif.”
People v. Litchfield, 918 P.2d 1099 (Colo. 1996). “1, §§ 18-18-101 to -605, 1992 Colo. Sess. Laws 324 .”
Felts v. Cnty. Ct. in & for Las Animas Cty., 725 P.2d 61 (Colo. Ct. App. 1986). “Our following review of the statutory scheme of § 18-18-101, et seq., C.R.S. (1985 Cum. Supp.”
People v. Reed, 932 P.2d 842 (Colo. Ct. App. 1996). “First, § 18-18-101, et seq., C.R.S. (1996 Cum.Supp.”
People v. Wright, 678 P.2d 1072 (Colo. Ct. App. 1984). “5) (Similar provisions are now contained in § 18-18-101, et seq., C.R.S. (1983 Cum.Supp.”
People v. Sprowl, 718 P.2d 524 (Colo. 1986). “Sections 18-18-101 to 109, 8 C.R.S. (1985 Supp.”
Young v. Larimer Cnty. Sheriff's Off., 356 P.3d 939 (Colo. Ct. App. 2014). “Analysis 119 Young argues that the seizure of his marijuana plants constituted a taking for a public purpose because the plants were used as evidence in a public trial, to prove that he violated Colorado's Uniform Controlled Substances Act, §§ 18-18-101 to - 606, C.R.S$.2018.…”
People v. Wilczynski, 873 P.2d 10 (Colo. Ct. App. 1993). “Offenses relating to controlled substances are defined in §§ 18-18-101, through 18-18-605, C.R.S. (1993 Cum.”
Knoll Pharm. Co. v. Sherman, 57 F. Supp. 2d 615 (N.D. Ill. 1999). “(1999); Colo.Rev.Stat. § 18-18-101 et seq. (1997); Conn.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.