Colo. Rev. Stat. » Title 18
Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-5-306 (2026)

Counterfeit or imitation controlled substances

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(Repealed)

Source: L. 81: Entire section added, p. 995, § 1, effective July 1; (1)(a) amended, p. 2031, § 46, effective January 1, 1982. L. 83: Entire section repealed, p. 704, § 4, effective July 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1984–2005 · leading case: People v. Moore, 674 P.2d 354 (Colo. 1984).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
People v. Moore, 674 P.2d 354 (Colo. 1984). · cites it 23× “In these consolidated appeals 1 the People challenge the district court rulings declaring unconstitutional section 18-5-306, C.R.S. (1978 Repl.Vol. 8) (1982 Supp.”
People v. Pharr, 696 P.2d 235 (Colo. 1984). · cites it 11× “The defendant claims that Colorado’s counterfeit controlled substance statute, § 18-5-306, 8 C.R.S. (1982 Supp.), is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad, extends beyond the state’s police power, and impermissibly creates a strict liability offense.”
People v. Taylor, 131 P.3d 1158 (Colo. Ct. App. 2005). “221, § 18-5-306(l)(b) at 995 (emphasis added).”
Hafelfinger v. Dist. Court In & For the Eighth Jud. Dist., 674 P.2d 375 (Colo. 1984). · cites it 3× “Section 18-5-306(2), C.R.S.1973 (1978 Repl.”
Hafelfinger v. Dist. Ct. for Eighth Jud. Dist., 674 P.2d 375 (Colo. 1984). · cites it 3× “NOTES [1] Section 18-5-306(2), C.R.S.1973 (1978 Repl.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-5-306(2) — 3 cases
People v. Moore, 674 P.2d 354 (Colo. 1984). “In these consolidated appeals 1 the People challenge the district court rulings declaring unconstitutional section 18-5-306, C.R.S. (1978 Repl.Vol. 8) (1982 Supp.”
Hafelfinger v. Dist. Court In & For the Eighth Jud. Dist., 674 P.2d 375 (Colo. 1984). “Section 18-5-306(2), C.R.S.1973 (1978 Repl.”
Hafelfinger v. Dist. Ct. for Eighth Jud. Dist., 674 P.2d 375 (Colo. 1984). “NOTES [1] Section 18-5-306(2), C.R.S.1973 (1978 Repl.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-5-306(3) — 1 case
People v. Pharr, 696 P.2d 235 (Colo. 1984). “The defendant claims that Colorado’s counterfeit controlled substance statute, § 18-5-306, 8 C.R.S. (1982 Supp.), is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad, extends beyond the state’s police power, and impermissibly creates a strict liability offense.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-5-306(l)(b) — 3 cases
People v. Moore, 674 P.2d 354 (Colo. 1984). “In these consolidated appeals 1 the People challenge the district court rulings declaring unconstitutional section 18-5-306, C.R.S. (1978 Repl.Vol. 8) (1982 Supp.”
People v. Pharr, 696 P.2d 235 (Colo. 1984). “The defendant claims that Colorado’s counterfeit controlled substance statute, § 18-5-306, 8 C.R.S. (1982 Supp.), is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad, extends beyond the state’s police power, and impermissibly creates a strict liability offense.”
People v. Taylor, 131 P.3d 1158 (Colo. Ct. App. 2005). “221, § 18-5-306(l)(b) at 995 (emphasis added).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.