Colorado Revised Statutes
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-206 (2026)
Representation of petitioner
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
In all proceedings brought under this article, the petitioner shall be represented by a county attorney, special county attorney, or city attorney of a city and county.
Source: L. 87: Entire title R&RE, p. 762, § 1, effective October 1.
Editor's note: This section was contained in a title that was repealed and reenacted in 1987. Provisions of this section, as it existed in 1987, are similar to those contained in 19-1-106 as said section existed in 1986, the year prior to the repeal and reenactment of this title.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1989–2016 · leading case: Berges v. Cnty. Court of Douglas Cnty., 2016 COA 146 (Colo. Ct. App. 2016).
Berges v. Cnty. Court of Douglas Cnty., 2016 COA 146 (Colo. Ct. App. 2016). “The district court denied all relief, upholding the county court’s determination and reiterating that “the mandate of C.R.S. § 19-3-206 does not apply to criminal prosecutions of failures-to-report.”
H.B. v. Lake Cnty. Dist. Court, 819 P.2d 499 (Colo. 1991). “§ 19-3-206, 8B C.R.S. (1991 Supp.). 3 The trial court denied the motion.”
People in Interest of AM, 786 P.2d 476 (Colo. Ct. App. 1989). “Section 19-3-206, C.R.S. (1988 Cum. Supp.”
People ex rel. A.M., 786 P.2d 476 (Colo. Ct. App. 1989). “Section 19-3-206, C.R.S. (1988 Cum. Supp.”
People in Interest of GS, 820 P.2d 1178 (Colo. Ct. App. 1991). “Section 19-3-206, C.R.S. (1990 Cum.Supp.); McCall v.”
People ex rel. G.S., 820 P.2d 1178 (Colo. Ct. App. 1991). “Section 19-3-206, C.R.S. (1990 Cum.Supp.); McCall v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.