Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-206 (2026)

Representation of petitioner

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

In all proceedings brought under this article, the petitioner shall be represented by a county attorney, special county attorney, or city attorney of a city and county.

Source: L. 87: Entire title R&RE, p. 762, § 1, effective October 1.

Editor's note: This section was contained in a title that was repealed and reenacted in 1987. Provisions of this section, as it existed in 1987, are similar to those contained in 19-1-106 as said section existed in 1986, the year prior to the repeal and reenactment of this title.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1989–2016 · leading case: Berges v. Cnty. Court of Douglas Cnty., 2016 COA 146 (Colo. Ct. App. 2016).
Berges v. Cnty. Court of Douglas Cnty., 2016 COA 146 (Colo. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 35× “The district court denied all relief, upholding the county court’s determination and reiterating that “the mandate of C.R.S. § 19-3-206 does not apply to criminal prosecutions of failures-to-report.”
H.B. v. Lake Cnty. Dist. Court, 819 P.2d 499 (Colo. 1991). · cites it 17× “§ 19-3-206, 8B C.R.S. (1991 Supp.). 3 The trial court denied the motion.”
People in Interest of AM, 786 P.2d 476 (Colo. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 5× “Section 19-3-206, C.R.S. (1988 Cum. Supp.”
People ex rel. A.M., 786 P.2d 476 (Colo. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 5× “Section 19-3-206, C.R.S. (1988 Cum. Supp.”
People in Interest of GS, 820 P.2d 1178 (Colo. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 3× “Section 19-3-206, C.R.S. (1990 Cum.Supp.); McCall v.”
People ex rel. G.S., 820 P.2d 1178 (Colo. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 3× “Section 19-3-206, C.R.S. (1990 Cum.Supp.); McCall v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.