Colorado Revised Statutes
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-6-105 (2026)
Failure to comply
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) A person failing to comply with an order of the court entered under this article shall be found in contempt of court in accordance with section 14-14- 110, C.R.S.
(2) The court shall have authority to issue writs of execution for the collection of accrued and unpaid installments of support orders.
Source: L. 87: Entire title R&RE, p. 812, § 1, effective October 1. L. 89: (1) amended, p. 796, § 26, effective July 1.
Editor's note: This section was contained in a title that was repealed and reenacted in 1987. Provisions of this section, as it existed in 1987, are similar to those contained in 19-7-104 as said section existed in 1986, the year prior to the repeal and reenactment of this title.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 26
cases, 1976–1999 · leading case: R.Mcg. v. J.W., 615 P.2d 666 (Colo. 1980).
R.Mcg. v. J.W., 615 P.2d 666 (Colo. 1980). “8), permitting a person alleging himself to be the father to bring such an action "with respect to a child who has no presumed father under section 19-6-105." It would seem that, once the presumption of paternity created by that latter section has been rebutted, the child has no…”
People Ex Rel. S.L.H. v. J.M.H., 736 P.2d 1226 (Colo. Ct. App. 1986). “8B) provides that a man presumed to be the child's father under § 19-6-105(1)(a), C.R.S. (1986 Repl.Vol. 8B) may bring an action to declare the nonexistence of the father and child relationship presumed under § 19-6-105(1)(a) no later than five years after the child's birth.”
D.S.P. v. R.L.K., 677 P.2d 959 (Colo. Ct. App. 1983). “These include: Section 19-6-105, C.R.S.1973: “(1) A man is presumed to be the natural father of a child if: “(a) He and the child's natural mother are or have been married to each other and the child is born during the marriage, or within three hundred days after the marriage is…”
People in Interest of JMA, 803 P.2d 187 (Colo. 1990). “The first part of section 19-6-108 provides: An action to determine the existence of the father and child relationship as to a child who has no presumed father under section 19-6-105 may not be brought later than three years after the birth of the child or later than three years…”
People in the Interest of AAT, 554 P.2d 302 (Colo. 1976). “The respondent further contends that as a matter of law the court could not issue an order for back support by reason of section 19-6-105(3)(c), C.R.S. 1973, which provides: “The order declaring paternity may also direct the father to pay for support of the child prior to such…”
People in Interest of RTL, 780 P.2d 508 (Colo. 1989). “2d 666 (1980) (construing § 19-6-105(1)(a), 8 C.R.S. (1978), which is the statutory predecessor to the present version of § 19-4-105(1)(a)).”
In Re Marriage of Weaver, 571 P.2d 307 (Colo. Ct. App. 1977). “In a paternity proceeding, which except in certain unusual circumstances, cannot be commenced after the child reaches the age of five years, § 19-6-101(2), C.”
In the Matter of A.L.B., 994 P.2d 476 (Colo. Ct. App. 1999). “Section 19-6-105(3.2), C.R.S.1999. Here, the child’s guardian ad litem recommended that the child remain with the Does and opined that termination was in the child’s best interests.”
People in Interest of LW, 756 P.2d 392 (Colo. Ct. App. 1988). “That provision, § 19-6-105(3)(c), C.R.S., stated: "The order declaring paternity may also direct the father to pay for support of the child prior to such order.”
People ex rel. R.F.A., 744 P.2d 1202 (Colo. Ct. App. 1987). “See § 19-6-105(2), C.R.S. (1986 Repl.Vol. 8B).”
People ex rel. Cnty. of Sonoma ex rel. J.S. v. Holleron, 797 P.2d 806 (Colo. Ct. App. 1990). “statute of limitations stated: “An action to determine the existence of the father and child relationship as to a child who has no presumed father under section 19-6-105 may not be brought later than three years after the birth of the child.”
B. G. v. S. G., 609 P.2d 121 (Colo. 1980). “The Uniform Parentage Act deals expressly with the times within which an action may be brought to declare the existence or nonexistence of the father and child relationship in situations in which a presumption of paternity exists.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-6-105(1)(a) — 7 cases
R.Mcg. v. J.W., 615 P.2d 666 (Colo. 1980). “8), permitting a person alleging himself to be the father to bring such an action "with respect to a child who has no presumed father under section 19-6-105." It would seem that, once the presumption of paternity created by that latter section has been rebutted, the child has no…”
People Ex Rel. S.L.H. v. J.M.H., 736 P.2d 1226 (Colo. Ct. App. 1986). “8B) provides that a man presumed to be the child's father under § 19-6-105(1)(a), C.R.S. (1986 Repl.Vol. 8B) may bring an action to declare the nonexistence of the father and child relationship presumed under § 19-6-105(1)(a) no later than five years after the child's birth.”
People in Interest of RTL, 780 P.2d 508 (Colo. 1989). “2d 666 (1980) (construing § 19-6-105(1)(a), 8 C.R.S. (1978), which is the statutory predecessor to the present version of § 19-4-105(1)(a)).”
Mw & Aw v. Dg, 710 P.2d 1174 (Colo. Ct. App. 1985).
People in Interest of MPR, 723 P.2d 743 (Colo. Ct. App. 1986).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-6-105(1)(c) — 1 case
R.Mcg. v. J.W., 615 P.2d 666 (Colo. 1980). “8), permitting a person alleging himself to be the father to bring such an action "with respect to a child who has no presumed father under section 19-6-105." It would seem that, once the presumption of paternity created by that latter section has been rebutted, the child has no…”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-6-105(1)(d) — 2 cases
R.Mcg. v. J.W., 615 P.2d 666 (Colo. 1980). “8), permitting a person alleging himself to be the father to bring such an action "with respect to a child who has no presumed father under section 19-6-105." It would seem that, once the presumption of paternity created by that latter section has been rebutted, the child has no…”
People Ex Rel. S.L.H. v. J.M.H., 736 P.2d 1226 (Colo. Ct. App. 1986). “8B) provides that a man presumed to be the child's father under § 19-6-105(1)(a), C.R.S. (1986 Repl.Vol. 8B) may bring an action to declare the nonexistence of the father and child relationship presumed under § 19-6-105(1)(a) no later than five years after the child's birth.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-6-105(1)(e) — 1 case
R.Mcg. v. J.W., 615 P.2d 666 (Colo. 1980). “8), permitting a person alleging himself to be the father to bring such an action "with respect to a child who has no presumed father under section 19-6-105." It would seem that, once the presumption of paternity created by that latter section has been rebutted, the child has no…”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-6-105(1)(f) — 1 case
People in Interest of RFA, 744 P.2d 1202 (Colo. Ct. App. 1987).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-6-105(2) — 6 cases
R.Mcg. v. J.W., 615 P.2d 666 (Colo. 1980). “8), permitting a person alleging himself to be the father to bring such an action "with respect to a child who has no presumed father under section 19-6-105." It would seem that, once the presumption of paternity created by that latter section has been rebutted, the child has no…”
People Ex Rel. S.L.H. v. J.M.H., 736 P.2d 1226 (Colo. Ct. App. 1986). “8B) provides that a man presumed to be the child's father under § 19-6-105(1)(a), C.R.S. (1986 Repl.Vol. 8B) may bring an action to declare the nonexistence of the father and child relationship presumed under § 19-6-105(1)(a) no later than five years after the child's birth.”
People ex rel. R.F.A., 744 P.2d 1202 (Colo. Ct. App. 1987). “See § 19-6-105(2), C.R.S. (1986 Repl.Vol. 8B).”
M.W. v. D.G., 710 P.2d 1174 (Colo. Ct. App. 1985).
Mw & Aw v. Dg, 710 P.2d 1174 (Colo. Ct. App. 1985).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-6-105(3)(a) — 1 case
In Re Marriage of Weaver, 571 P.2d 307 (Colo. Ct. App. 1977). “In a paternity proceeding, which except in certain unusual circumstances, cannot be commenced after the child reaches the age of five years, § 19-6-101(2), C.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-6-105(3)(c) — 3 cases
People in the Interest of AAT, 554 P.2d 302 (Colo. 1976). “The respondent further contends that as a matter of law the court could not issue an order for back support by reason of section 19-6-105(3)(c), C.R.S. 1973, which provides: “The order declaring paternity may also direct the father to pay for support of the child prior to such…”
People in Interest of LW, 756 P.2d 392 (Colo. Ct. App. 1988). “That provision, § 19-6-105(3)(c), C.R.S., stated: "The order declaring paternity may also direct the father to pay for support of the child prior to such order.”
People ex rel. L.W., 756 P.2d 392 (Colo. Ct. App. 1988).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-6-105(l)(a) — 7 cases
People Ex Rel. S.L.H. v. J.M.H., 736 P.2d 1226 (Colo. Ct. App. 1986). “8B) provides that a man presumed to be the child's father under § 19-6-105(1)(a), C.R.S. (1986 Repl.Vol. 8B) may bring an action to declare the nonexistence of the father and child relationship presumed under § 19-6-105(1)(a) no later than five years after the child's birth.”
R.Mcg. v. J.W., 615 P.2d 666 (Colo. 1980). “8), permitting a person alleging himself to be the father to bring such an action "with respect to a child who has no presumed father under section 19-6-105." It would seem that, once the presumption of paternity created by that latter section has been rebutted, the child has no…”
D.S.P. v. R.L.K., 677 P.2d 959 (Colo. Ct. App. 1983). “These include: Section 19-6-105, C.R.S.1973: “(1) A man is presumed to be the natural father of a child if: “(a) He and the child's natural mother are or have been married to each other and the child is born during the marriage, or within three hundred days after the marriage is…”
People in Interest of JMA, 803 P.2d 187 (Colo. 1990). “The first part of section 19-6-108 provides: An action to determine the existence of the father and child relationship as to a child who has no presumed father under section 19-6-105 may not be brought later than three years after the birth of the child or later than three years…”
M.R.D. ex rel. P.D. ex rel. R.F.D. v. F.M., 805 P.2d 1200 (Colo. Ct. App. 1991).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-6-105(l)(d) — 3 cases
R.Mcg. v. J.W., 615 P.2d 666 (Colo. 1980). “8), permitting a person alleging himself to be the father to bring such an action "with respect to a child who has no presumed father under section 19-6-105." It would seem that, once the presumption of paternity created by that latter section has been rebutted, the child has no…”
People Ex Rel. S.L.H. v. J.M.H., 736 P.2d 1226 (Colo. Ct. App. 1986). “8B) provides that a man presumed to be the child's father under § 19-6-105(1)(a), C.R.S. (1986 Repl.Vol. 8B) may bring an action to declare the nonexistence of the father and child relationship presumed under § 19-6-105(1)(a) no later than five years after the child's birth.”
D.S.P. v. R.L.K., 677 P.2d 959 (Colo. Ct. App. 1983). “These include: Section 19-6-105, C.R.S.1973: “(1) A man is presumed to be the natural father of a child if: “(a) He and the child's natural mother are or have been married to each other and the child is born during the marriage, or within three hundred days after the marriage is…”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-6-105(l)(e) — 1 case
D.S.P. v. R.L.K., 677 P.2d 959 (Colo. Ct. App. 1983). “These include: Section 19-6-105, C.R.S.1973: “(1) A man is presumed to be the natural father of a child if: “(a) He and the child's natural mother are or have been married to each other and the child is born during the marriage, or within three hundred days after the marriage is…”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-6-105(l)(f) — 2 cases
D.S.P. v. R.L.K., 677 P.2d 959 (Colo. Ct. App. 1983). “These include: Section 19-6-105, C.R.S.1973: “(1) A man is presumed to be the natural father of a child if: “(a) He and the child's natural mother are or have been married to each other and the child is born during the marriage, or within three hundred days after the marriage is…”
People ex rel. R.F.A., 744 P.2d 1202 (Colo. Ct. App. 1987). “See § 19-6-105(2), C.R.S. (1986 Repl.Vol. 8B).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.