Colorado Revised Statutes
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 2-1-102 (2026)
Neutral criteria for judicial determinations of congressional districts
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(Repealed)
Source: L. 2004: Entire section added, p. 312, § 1, effective April 7. L. 2010: Entire section amended, (HB 10-1408), ch. 369, p. 1735, § 1, effective August 11. L. 2017: IP(1) amended, (HB 17-1074), ch. 22, p. 68, § 2, effective August 9. L. 2020: Entire section repealed, (SB 20-186), ch. 272, p. 1320, § 1, effective July 11.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 2012–2016 · leading case: Hall v. Moreno, 270 P.3d 961 (Colo. 2012).
Hall v. Moreno, 270 P.3d 961 (Colo. 2012). “In relevant part, section 2-1-102, C.R.S. (2011), states: (1) [In adopting or enforcing any change to any [congressional] district, courts: (a) Shall utilize the following factors: (I) A good faith effort to achieve precise mathematical population equality between districts,…”
In re Title, Ballot Title & Submission Clause for 2015–2016 132 & 133, 2016 CO 55 (Colo. 2016). “These criteria appear to be drawn from section 2-1-102, C.R.S. (2015), a statute that lists both mandatory and permissive factors that courts presently consider in reviewing the lawfulness of a congressional redistricting plan.”
In re Senate Jt. Resolution of Legislative Apportionment 1176, 83 So. 3d 597 (Fla. 2012). “A “Sisyphean task,” then, is one that is "[e]ndlessly laborious or futile.” Id. . Several jurisdictions require the state’s redistricting body to expressly comply with the VRA when drawing district lines.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 2-1-102(1)(a) — 1 case
Hall v. Moreno, 270 P.3d 961 (Colo. 2012). “In relevant part, section 2-1-102, C.R.S. (2011), states: (1) [In adopting or enforcing any change to any [congressional] district, courts: (a) Shall utilize the following factors: (I) A good faith effort to achieve precise mathematical population equality between districts,…”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 2-1-102(1)(a)(I) — 1 case
Hall v. Moreno, 270 P.3d 961 (Colo. 2012). “In relevant part, section 2-1-102, C.R.S. (2011), states: (1) [In adopting or enforcing any change to any [congressional] district, courts: (a) Shall utilize the following factors: (I) A good faith effort to achieve precise mathematical population equality between districts,…”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 2-1-102(1)(b) — 1 case
Hall v. Moreno, 270 P.3d 961 (Colo. 2012). “In relevant part, section 2-1-102, C.R.S. (2011), states: (1) [In adopting or enforcing any change to any [congressional] district, courts: (a) Shall utilize the following factors: (I) A good faith effort to achieve precise mathematical population equality between districts,…”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 2-1-102(1)(b)(II) — 1 case
Hall v. Moreno, 270 P.3d 961 (Colo. 2012). “In relevant part, section 2-1-102, C.R.S. (2011), states: (1) [In adopting or enforcing any change to any [congressional] district, courts: (a) Shall utilize the following factors: (I) A good faith effort to achieve precise mathematical population equality between districts,…”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 2-1-102(1)(b)(IV) — 1 case
Hall v. Moreno, 270 P.3d 961 (Colo. 2012). “In relevant part, section 2-1-102, C.R.S. (2011), states: (1) [In adopting or enforcing any change to any [congressional] district, courts: (a) Shall utilize the following factors: (I) A good faith effort to achieve precise mathematical population equality between districts,…”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 2-1-102(a)(1)(II) — 1 case
Hall v. Moreno, 270 P.3d 961 (Colo. 2012). “In relevant part, section 2-1-102, C.R.S. (2011), states: (1) [In adopting or enforcing any change to any [congressional] district, courts: (a) Shall utilize the following factors: (I) A good faith effort to achieve precise mathematical population equality between districts,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.