As used in this part 1, unless the context otherwise requires:
(1) "Commissioner of education" or "commissioner" means the office of the commissioner of education created and existing pursuant to section 1 of article IX of the state constitution.
(2) "Department of education" or "department" means the department of education created and existing pursuant to section 24-1-115, C.R.S.
(3) "Nonpublic school" means a school organized and maintained by a recognized religious or independent association performing an academic function.
(4) "Public school" means a school maintained and operated by a school district.
(4.5) "Pupil enrollment count day" has the same meaning as set forth in section 22-54- 103 (10.5).
(5) "State board of education" or "state board" means the state board of education created and existing pursuant to section 1 of article IX of the state constitution.
Source: L. 64: R&RE, p. 528, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 123-1-2. L. 75: (4) amended, p. 786, § 3, effective July 1. L. 2012: (4.5) added, (HB 12-1090), ch. 44, p. 149, § 2, effective March 22.
Notes of Decisions
D.W. v. Dist. Court, 564 P.2d 949 (Colo. 1977).
“*197 “(c) The Court below allowed the introduction of statements and admissions as a result of interrogation of the child by a law enforcement official even though an attorney or parent of the child was not present at the time of interrogation as admitted by the police officer…”
D.W. v. Dist. Court, 564 P.2d 949 (Colo. 1977).
“*197 “(c) The Court below allowed the introduction of statements and admissions as a result of interrogation of the child by a law enforcement official even though an attorney or parent of the child was not present at the time of interrogation as admitted by the police officer…”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 22-2-102(2)(c) — 2 cases
D.W. v. Dist. Court, 564 P.2d 949 (Colo. 1977).
“*197 “(c) The Court below allowed the introduction of statements and admissions as a result of interrogation of the child by a law enforcement official even though an attorney or parent of the child was not present at the time of interrogation as admitted by the police officer…”
D.W. v. Dist. Court, 564 P.2d 949 (Colo. 1977).
“*197 “(c) The Court below allowed the introduction of statements and admissions as a result of interrogation of the child by a law enforcement official even though an attorney or parent of the child was not present at the time of interrogation as admitted by the police officer…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.