Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 22-54-101 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The short title of this article 54 is the "Public School Finance Act of 2025".

Source: L. 94: Entire article added with relocations, p. 779, § 2, effective April 27. L. 2024: Entire section amended, (HB 24-1448), ch. 236, p. 1480, § 1, effective May 23.

22-54-102. Statewide applicability - intergovernmental agreements - legislative declaration. (1) The general assembly finds and declares that this article 54 is enacted in furtherance of the general assembly's duty under section 2 of article IX of the state constitution to provide for a thorough and uniform system of public schools throughout the state; that a thorough and uniform system requires that all school districts and institute charter schools operate under the same finance formula; and that equity considerations dictate that all districts and institute charter schools be subject to the expenditure and maximum levy provisions of this article 54. Accordingly, the provisions of this article 54 concerning the financing of public schools apply to all school districts and institute charter schools organized under the laws of this state.

(2) (a) The general assembly further finds and declares that:

(I) A thorough and uniform system of public education creates a learning environment in which all learners are civically engaged; physically, socially, and emotionally healthy; competent academic scholars; and, upon graduation, ready to contribute productively to the economy and prepared for a rapidly changing world;

(II) A world-class public education learning environment is critical to meeting the workforce demands for Colorado's thriving and dynamic economy;

(III) The changing realities of Colorado's economy demand that students be agile learners able to continuously learn, adapt, and shift into new roles by developing critical thinking, collaboration, and problem-solving skills;

(IV) The needs of the state require that all students, including those who are underserved or face significant challenges in meeting Colorado's graduation guidelines, complete high school and are ready for career or postsecondary education;

(V) Colorado's total program formula, pursuant to section 22-54-104, drastically underfunds Colorado's most historically underserved students, including at-risk students, English language learners, and students with special needs. Since the COVID-19 pandemic, the achievement gap between these students and their peers has grown exponentially. Research shows that directing additional funding to these students bolsters their academic outcomes.

(VI) Colorado's total program formula, pursuant to section 22-54-104, has not been significantly updated since 1994. As the general assembly commits to fully buying down the budget stabilization factor, there is an opportune moment to modernize the total program formula to better meet the needs of students, educators, communities, and schools.

(VII) In the years since this article 54 was originally enacted in 1994, constitutional provisions, statutory requirements, public expectations, and student demographics have placed greater demands on Colorado's public education learning environment; and

(VIII) Challenges to recruit and retain educators and school leaders, and impediments to beneficial innovation, continue to threaten Colorado's public education learning environment. (b) To provide each child in this state with a high-quality public education, the general assembly finds and declares that Colorado's public school finance formula must be redesigned and modernized to:

(I) Prioritize equity by focusing on individual student needs, including prioritized funding for students experiencing poverty, students with special education needs, and students who are English language learners;

(II) Recognize and adjust funding for differences among school districts and public schools related to size, remoteness, and cost of living;

(III) Promote greater understanding of public education funding for policymakers, educators, community members, families, and students by creating transparency and simplicity in the school finance formula calculation; and

(IV) Responsibly phase in a new total program formula over a period of time so that it is sustainable, and allow school districts and schools an amount of time necessary to adjust to the phase-in.

(3) The general assembly finds and declares that in enacting this article 54 it has adopted a formula for the support of schools; however, the adoption of the formula in no way is a commitment on the part of the general assembly concerning the level of total funding for schools.

(4) (a) This article 54 does not prohibit local governments from cooperating with districts through intergovernmental agreements to fund, construct, maintain, or manage capital construction projects or other facilities as set forth in section 22-45-103 (1)(c)(I)(A) or (1)(c)(I)(D), including, but not limited to, swimming pools, playgrounds, or ball fields, if funding for the projects is provided solely from a source of local government revenue that is otherwise authorized by law, except impact fees or other similar development charges or fees.

(b) Notwithstanding subsection (4)(a) of this section to the contrary, this subsection (4) does not:

(I) Limit or restrict a county's power to require the reservation or dedication of sites and land areas for schools or the payment of money in lieu thereof pursuant to section 30-28-133 (4)(a); and

(II) Repealed.

(III) Grant authority to local governments to require the reservation or dedication of sites and land areas for schools or the payment of money; however, the prohibition on impact fees or other similar development charges or fees contained in this subsection (4) does not restrict the authority of any local government to require the reservation or dedication of sites and land areas for schools or the payment of money if the local government otherwise has the authority granted by law.

Source: L. 94: Entire article added with relocations, p. 779, § 2, effective April 27. L. 96: (3) added, p. 1802, § 29, effective June 4; (3) amended, p. 1859, § 1, effective June 5. L. 2000: (3)(a) amended, p. 520, § 6, effective August 2. L. 2004: (1) amended, p. 1636, § 41, effective July 1. L. 2006: (3)(b)(II) repealed, p. 611, § 39, effective August 7. L. 2015: (4) added, (SB 15-267), ch. 295, p. 1203, § 5, effective June 5. L. 2021: (5) added, (SB 21-268), ch. 222, p. 1187, § 26, effective June 11. L. 2024: Entire section amended, (HB 24-1448), ch. 236, p. 1480, § 2, effective May 23.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases, 1996–2015 · leading case: Taxpayers for Pub. Educ. v. Douglas Cnty. Sch. Dist., 2015 CO 50 (Colo. 2015).
Taxpayers for Pub. Educ. v. Douglas Cnty. Sch. Dist., 2015 CO 50 (Colo. 2015). · cites it 10× “, § 22-54-101, C.R.S. (2014) (short title) (emphasis added); § 22-54-102(1) (legislative declaration) (emphasis added); § 22-54-104(1)(a) (“[T]he provisions of this section shall be used to calculate for each district an amount that represents the financial base of support…”
Lobato v. State, 218 P.3d 358 (Colo. 2009). “Plaintiffs detail specific complaints with the following components of the education funding system: the Public School Finance Act ("PSFA"), sections 22-54-101 to-134, C.R.S. (2009); categorical program funding (non-PSFA funding for specific programs serving certain underserved…”
Dwyer v. State, 2015 CO 58 (Colo. 2015). · cites it 2× “See §§ 22-54-101 to -137, C.R.S. (2015). Prior to the passage of Amendment 23, the Act calculated the “total program” funding for each district.”
Cacioppo v. Eagle Cnty. Sch. Dist. Re-50J, 92 P.3d 453 (Colo. 2004). “(2003), a 2001 amendment to the Public School Finance Act of 1994, § 22-54-101, et seq., TA C.R.S. (2003). Ch 127, see.”
Lobato v. State, 304 P.3d 1132 (Colo. 2013). “§§ 22-54-101 to -185, C.R.S. (2012). The PSFA sets out a uniform per-pupil formula that the state uses to calculate the amount of education funding each school district shall receive in a given year.”
Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners v. Bainbridge, Inc., 929 P.2d 691 (Colo. 1996). · cites it 2× “The Public School Finance Act The purpose of the Public School Finance Act of 1994, sections 22-54-101 to -120, 9 C.R.S. (1995 & 1996 Supp.”
In Re the Title, Ballot Title & Submission Clause, & Summary for No. 26, 954 P.2d 586 (Colo. 1998). · cites it 2× “Currently, state funding to meet the needs of increased school enrollment comes to school districts through operation of the School Finance Act, §§ 22-54-101 to -21, 7 C.R.S. (1997). The proposed measure's applicability is dependent on future growth and home building within the…”
Cnty. Com'rs of Douglas v. Bainbridge, 929 P.2d 691 (Colo. 1997). · cites it 2× “The Public School Finance Act The purpose of the Public School Finance Act of 1994, sections 22-54-101 to -120, 9 C.R.S. (1995 & 1996 Supp.”
Taxpayers for Pub. Educ. v. Douglas Cnty. Sch. Dist., 356 P.3d 833 (Colo. Ct. App. 2013). “They filed suit to enjoin implementation of the CSP, claiming that it violates the Public School Finance Act of 1994, sections 22-54-101 to - 185, C.R.S$.2012 (the Act), and various provisions of the Colorado Constitution.”
Booth v. Bd. of Educ., 950 P.2d 601 (Colo. Ct. App. 1998). “For purposes of the Public School Finance Act of 1994, § 22-54-101, et seq., C.R.S. (1995 Repl.Vol.”
Cacioppo v. Eagle Cnty. Sch. Dis., 92 P.3d 453 (Colo. 2004). “(2003), a 2001 amendment to the Public School Finance Act of 1994, § 22-54-101, et seq., 7A C.R.S. (2003). Ch 127, sec.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.