Colo. Rev. Stat. » Title 24
Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 24-10-112 (2026)

Compromise of claims - settlement of actions

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) (a) (I) A claim against the state may be compromised or settled for and on behalf of the state by the attorney general, with the concurrence of the head of the affected department, agency, board, commission, institution, hospital, college, university, or other instrumentality thereof, except as provided in part 15 of article 30 of this title.

(II) Repealed.

(b) Repealed.

(2) Claims against public entities, other than the state, may be compromised or settled by the governing body of the public entity or in such manner as the governing body may designate. Source: L. 71: p. 1209, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 130-11-12. L. 85, 1st Ex. Sess.: (1) amended, p. 10, § 6, effective September 27. L. 86: (1)(a)(II) and (1)(b) repealed, p. 894, § 10, effective April 17.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1986–2003 · leading case: The Univ. of Colorado v. Booth, 78 P.3d 1098 (Colo. 2003).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
The Univ. of Colorado v. Booth, 78 P.3d 1098 (Colo. 2003). · cites it 9× “The full text of section 24-10-112 reads: (1)(a)(I) A claim against the state may be compromised or settled for and on behalf of the state by the attorney general, with the concurrence of the head of the affected department, agency, board, commission, institution, hospital,…”
Uberoi v. Univ. of Colorado, 713 P.2d 894 (Colo. 1986). · cites it 4× “§ 24-10-112(1), 10 C.R.S. (1982) (emphasis added).”
State Pers. Bd. v. Lloyd, 752 P.2d 559 (Colo. 1988). · cites it 4× “Unlike the Employee Protection Act, the Immunity Act specifically provides for a statute of limitations, see sections 24-10-109(5), -118(1)(a); the availability of insurance, see section 24-10-115; the payment of judgments in general, see section 24-10-113, and against public…”
Plummer v. Little, 987 P.2d 871 (Colo. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “Examples include § 24-10-103(4)(b)(“health care practitioner” when defining “public employee” and using the term “public entity” instead of “hospital” in describing when a “health care practitioner” is a “public employee” under the GIA); § 24-10-112, C.R.S. 1998 (stating that a…”
Schmidt v. Harken, 42 P.3d 34 (Colo. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 4× “Section 24-10-112, C.R.S.2000, which de-seribes how a claim against the state may be compromised under the CGIA, provides that: (1)(a)(I) A claim against the state may be compromised or settled for and on behalf of the state by the attorney general, with the concurrence of the…”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 24-10-112(1) — 1 case
Uberoi v. Univ. of Colorado, 713 P.2d 894 (Colo. 1986). “§ 24-10-112(1), 10 C.R.S. (1982) (emphasis added).”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 24-10-112(1)(a)(I) — 1 case
The Univ. of Colorado v. Booth, 78 P.3d 1098 (Colo. 2003). “The full text of section 24-10-112 reads: (1)(a)(I) A claim against the state may be compromised or settled for and on behalf of the state by the attorney general, with the concurrence of the head of the affected department, agency, board, commission, institution, hospital,…”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 24-10-112(2) — 1 case
The Univ. of Colorado v. Booth, 78 P.3d 1098 (Colo. 2003). “The full text of section 24-10-112 reads: (1)(a)(I) A claim against the state may be compromised or settled for and on behalf of the state by the attorney general, with the concurrence of the head of the affected department, agency, board, commission, institution, hospital,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.