Colo. Rev. Stat. » Title 24
Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 24-67-103 (2026)

Definitions

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

As used in this article, unless the context otherwise requires:

(1) "Common open space" means a parcel of land, an area of water, or a combination of land and water within the site designated for a planned unit development designed and intended primarily for the use or enjoyment of residents, occupants, and owners of the planned unit development.

(2) "Plan" means the provisions for development of a planned unit development, which may include, and need not be limited to, easements, covenants, and restrictions relating to use, location, and bulk of buildings and other structures, intensity of use or density of development, utilities, private and public streets, ways, roads, pedestrian areas, and parking facilities, common open space, and other public facilities. "Provisions of the plan" means the written and graphic materials referred to in this definition.

(3) "Planned unit development" means an area of land, controlled by one or more landowners, to be developed under unified control or unified plan of development for a number of dwelling units, commercial, educational, recreational, or industrial uses, or any combination of the foregoing, the plan for which does not correspond in lot size, bulk, or type of use, density, lot coverage, open space, or other restriction to the existing land use regulations.

Source: L. 72: p. 509, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 106-6-3.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1985–2026 · leading case: Bd. of Assessment Appeals v. Colorado Arlberg Club, 762 P.2d 146 (Colo. 1988).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Bd. of Assessment Appeals v. Colorado Arlberg Club, 762 P.2d 146 (Colo. 1988). · cites it 2× “" § 24-67-103(1), 10 C.R.S. (1982); see also Grand County Planned Unit Development Regulations (PUD Regs.”
Hygiene Fire Prot. Dist. v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 205 P.3d 487 (Colo. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 4× “See § 24-67-103(3), C.R.S.2008. It thus creates "an alternative to traditional zoning.”
Beaver Meadows v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 709 P.2d 928 (Colo. 1985). · cites it 2× “A PUD “plan” as defined in section 24-67-103(2), 10 C.R.S. (1982), may include provisions relating to the “intensity of use or density of development” and “private and public streets, ways, roads, .”
Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners v. Hygiene Fire Prot. Dist., 221 P.3d 1063 (Colo. 2009). · cites it 2× “As defined by the General Assembly, a PUD is an area of land, controlled by one or more landowners, to be developed under unified control or unified plan of development for a number of dwelling units, commercial, educational, recreational, or industrial uses, or any combination…”
Luck v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 789 P.2d 475 (Colo. Ct. App. 1990). “1984) (invalid 1971 resolution purporting to amend ODP was attempted rezoning action by county, rather than action on plat); see also §§ 24-67-103(2) and 24-67-103(3), C.R.S. (1988 Repl.”
Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners v. Bainbridge, Inc., 929 P.2d 691 (Colo. 1996). “§ 24-67-103(3), 10B C.R.S. (1988). The authority delegated to counties and municipalities is to “provide for necessary commercial, recreational, and educational facilities conveniently located to such housing.”
Cnty. Com'rs of Douglas v. Bainbridge, 929 P.2d 691 (Colo. 1997). “§ 24-67-103(3), 10B C.R.S. (1988). The authority delegated to counties and municipalities is to "provide for necessary commercial, recreational, and educational facilities conveniently located to such housing.”
Park Cnty. v. aSkag LLC (Colo. Ct. App. 2026). · cites it 2× “]” § 24-67-103(3), C.R.S. 2025 (emphasis added).”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 24-67-103(1) — 1 case
Bd. of Assessment Appeals v. Colorado Arlberg Club, 762 P.2d 146 (Colo. 1988). “" § 24-67-103(1), 10 C.R.S. (1982); see also Grand County Planned Unit Development Regulations (PUD Regs.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 24-67-103(2) — 2 cases
Beaver Meadows v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 709 P.2d 928 (Colo. 1985). “A PUD “plan” as defined in section 24-67-103(2), 10 C.R.S. (1982), may include provisions relating to the “intensity of use or density of development” and “private and public streets, ways, roads, .”
Luck v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 789 P.2d 475 (Colo. Ct. App. 1990). “1984) (invalid 1971 resolution purporting to amend ODP was attempted rezoning action by county, rather than action on plat); see also §§ 24-67-103(2) and 24-67-103(3), C.R.S. (1988 Repl.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 24-67-103(3) — 5 cases
Hygiene Fire Prot. Dist. v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 205 P.3d 487 (Colo. Ct. App. 2008). “See § 24-67-103(3), C.R.S.2008. It thus creates "an alternative to traditional zoning.”
Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners v. Hygiene Fire Prot. Dist., 221 P.3d 1063 (Colo. 2009). “As defined by the General Assembly, a PUD is an area of land, controlled by one or more landowners, to be developed under unified control or unified plan of development for a number of dwelling units, commercial, educational, recreational, or industrial uses, or any combination…”
Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners v. Bainbridge, Inc., 929 P.2d 691 (Colo. 1996). “§ 24-67-103(3), 10B C.R.S. (1988). The authority delegated to counties and municipalities is to “provide for necessary commercial, recreational, and educational facilities conveniently located to such housing.”
Cnty. Com'rs of Douglas v. Bainbridge, 929 P.2d 691 (Colo. 1997). “§ 24-67-103(3), 10B C.R.S. (1988). The authority delegated to counties and municipalities is to "provide for necessary commercial, recreational, and educational facilities conveniently located to such housing.”
Park Cnty. v. aSkag LLC (Colo. Ct. App. 2026). “]” § 24-67-103(3), C.R.S. 2025 (emphasis added).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.