Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 24-68-106 (2026)

Miscellaneous provisions

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) As used in this article, the term "development" includes redevelopment.

(2) A vested property right arising while one local government has jurisdiction over all or part of the property included within a site specific development plan shall be effective against any other local government which may subsequently obtain or assert jurisdiction over such property.

(3) Nothing in this article shall preclude judicial determination, based on common law principles, that a vested property right exists in a particular case or that a compensable taking has occurred.

(4) This article shall apply only to site specific development plans approved on or after January 1, 1988.

Source: L. 87: Entire article added, p. 1840, § 1, effective January 1, 1988.

PUBLICATION OF LEGAL NOTICES AND PUBLIC PRINTING ARTICLE 70 Publication of Legal Notices and Public Printing Law reviews: For note, "Analysis of Basic Statutes on Legal Publications", see 19 Rocky Mt. L. Rev. 380 (1947).

PART 1 LEGAL NOTICES - PUBLICATION Law reviews: For article, "Publication of Legal Notices by Colorado Municipalities", see 22 Colo. Law. 59 (1993).

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 1996–1996 · leading case: Villa at Greeley, Inc. v. Hopper, 917 P.2d 350 (Colo. Ct. App. 1996).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Villa at Greeley, Inc. v. Hopper, 917 P.2d 350 (Colo. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 2× “See § 24-68-106(3), C.R.S. (1982 Repl.Vol. 16A) (“Nothing in this article shall preclude judicial determination, based on common law principles, that a vested property right exists in a particular case or that a compensable taking has occurred.”

— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 24-68-106(3) — 1 case

Villa at Greeley, Inc. v. Hopper, 917 P.2d 350 (Colo. Ct. App. 1996). “See § 24-68-106(3), C.R.S. (1982 Repl.Vol. 16A) (“Nothing in this article shall preclude judicial determination, based on common law principles, that a vested property right exists in a particular case or that a compensable taking has occurred.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.