Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 25-7-101 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This article shall be known and may be cited as the "Colorado Air Pollution Prevention and Control Act".

Source: L. 79: Entire article R&RE, p. 1017, § 1. L. 92: Entire section amended, p. 1165, § 3, effective July 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1976–2021 · leading case: Sierra Club v. Tri-State Generation & Transmission Ass'n, 173 F.R.D. 275 (D. Colo. 1997).
Sierra Club v. Tri-State Generation & Transmission Ass'n, 173 F.R.D. 275 (D. Colo. 1997). · cites it 4× “1996), and the Colorado Air Quality Control Act, Colo.Rev.Stat. §§ 25-7-101 to 25-7-1008 (1989 & Supp.”
Colorado-Ute Elec. Ass'n v. Air Pollution Control Comm'n of the Colorado Dep't of Health, 648 P.2d 150 (Colo. Ct. App. 1982). · cites it 6× “The Colorado Air Pollution Control Commission is an administrative agency created under the Air Pollution Control Act of 1970, now codified at § 25-7-101 et seq., C.R.S.1973. The Commission has the power to adopt, promulgate, amend, and modify ambient air standards and emission…”
Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co. v. State of Colorado Dep't of Health Air Pollution Variance Bd., 553 P.2d 800 (Colo. 1976). · cites it 4× “Section 25-7-101, et seq., C.R.S. 1973. [1] We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand with directions.”
State v. Sw. Colorado Water Conservation Dist., 671 P.2d 1294 (Colo. 1983). · cites it 2× “); [45] see also Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. §§ 1201 to 1328 (Supp.”
CF&I Steel Corp. v. Colorado Air Pollution Control Comm'n, 610 P.2d 85 (Colo. 1980). · cites it 2× “The Commission adopts regulations under authority of the Colorado Air Pollution Control Act (the Act), section 25-7-101 etseq., C.R.S. 1973. CF&I Steel Corporation (CF&I) initiated its action in September 1974, challenging the validity of Regulation No.”
Air Pollution Control Comm'n of the Colorado Dep't of Health v. Colorado-Ute Elec. Ass'n, 672 P.2d 993 (Colo. 1983). · cites it 3× “266, § 25-7-101 et seq. at 1017-61. The new act is codified at section 25-7-101 et seq.”
Sterling Ethanol, LLC v. Colorado Air Quality Control Comm'n, 2017 COA 26 (Colo. Ct. App. 2017). “Neither the Colorado Supreme Court nor any division of this court has published a decision examining how the Colorado Air Pollution Prevention and Control Act (the APPCA), §§ 25-7-101 to - 1309, C.R.S. 2016; the State Administrative Procedure Act (the APA), §§ 24-4-101 to -204,…”
United States v. K.P. Kauffman Co., 389 F. Supp. 3d 935 (D. Colo. 2019). · cites it 2× “§ 7413 (b) ; (2) the Colorado Air Pollution Prevention and Control Act ("APPCA"), Colo. Rev. Stat. § 25-7-101 ; (3) Colorado's federally approved State Implementation Plan ("SIP"); and (4) Colorado's Air Quality Control Commission Regulation Number 7 ("Regulation 7").”
Defend Colorado v. Governor Jared Polis, 2021 COA 8 (Colo. Ct. App. 2021). “§§ 7401-7671 , and the Colorado Air Pollution Prevention and Control Act, §§ 25-7-101 to -1309, C.R.S. 2020 (Colorado Air Act).”
CF & I Steel, L.P. v. Air Pollution Control Div., 77 P.3d 933 (Colo. Ct. App. 2003). “In June 2001, enforcement agents of the Division visited RMSM's steel-making facility to conduct a records inspection pursuant to the Colorado Air Pollution Prevention and Control Act, § 25-7-101, et seq., C.R.8.2002. RMSM permitted the agents to conduct the inspection, under…”
Colorado-Ute Elec. Ass'n, Inc. v. AIR POLLUTION, 591 P.2d 1323 (Colo. Ct. App. 1979). · cites it 2× “Section 25-7-101, et seq., C.R.S.1973. Colorado Ute further argues that even assuming the Commission, in adopting the regulation, acted within the legislative grant of authority, the regulation is invalid because it is arbitrary and capricious, an abuse of administrative…”
United States v. Louisiana Pac. Corp., 925 F. Supp. 1484 (D. Colo. 1996). “C.R.S. 25-7-101 et seq. The Colorado Air Quality Control Act is also the Colorado State Implementation Plan.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.