Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 33-44-101 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This article shall be known and may be cited as the "Ski Safety Act of 1979".

Source: L. 79: Entire article added, p. 1237, § 1, effective July 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 21 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1983–2024 · leading case: Graven v. Vail Assocs., Inc., 909 P.2d 514 (Colo. 1996).
Graven v. Vail Assocs., Inc., 909 P.2d 514 (Colo. 1996). · cites it 7× “The district court granted summary judgment for the defendant, based on its ruling that the plaintiff's claims were barred by the provisions of the Ski Safety Act of 1979, §§ 33-44-101 to -114, 14 C.R.S. (1995). The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed, holding that as a matter of…”
In Re: Michael Miller v. Crested Butte, LLC, 2024 CO 30 (Colo. 2024). · cites it 2× “— Absolution of Statutory Duty by In this case, the supreme court considers whether a defendant may absolve itself of statutory duties imposed by the Ski Safety Act of 1979, sections 33-44-101 to -114, C.R.S. (2023), the Passenger Tramway Safety Act, sections 12-150-101 to -120,…”
Rowan v. Vail Holdings, Inc., 31 F. Supp. 2d 889 (D. Colo. 1998). · cites it 4× “I agree that skiing is a regulated sport and that Vail may have historically provided access to glide testing. However, the most important thing looked at in connection with the first factor is whether the service is a matter of public importance and of public necessity.”
Stamp v. Vail Corp., 172 P.3d 437 (Colo. 2007). “This skiing-related wrongful death action involves the intersection of the Ski Safety Act ("SSA"), §§ 33-44-101 to-114, CRS. (2007), and the Wrongful Death Act ("WDA"), §§ 13-21-201 to ~204, C.”
Mincin v. Vail Holdings, Inc., 308 F.3d 1105 (10th Cir. 2002). “See Colo.Rev.Stat. §§ 33-44-101 to -114 (“Ski Safety Act”); id.”
Breanne Bennett v. Hidden Valley Golf & Ski, Inc., 318 F.3d 868 (8th Cir. 2003). “, Colo.Rev.Stat. Ann. § 33-44-101; Idaho Code § 6-1101 .”
v. Clear Creek Skiing Corp., 2020 COA 176 (Colo. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 2× “2020, and the Ski Safety Act of 1979, sections 33-44-101 to -114, C.R.S. 2020. One member of the division concludes that the exculpatory agreements violate the public policies underlying these statutes.”
Phillips v. Monarch Rec. Corp., 668 P.2d 982 (Colo. Ct. App. 1983). “A number of jury instructions were given relating to sections of the Ski Safety Act of 1979, § 33-44-101 et seq., C.R.S.1973 (1982 Cum.”
Del Bosco v. United States Ski Ass'n, 839 F. Supp. 1470 (D. Colo. 1993). · cites it 2× “Defendant argues that the Colorado Ski Safety and Liability Act (the Ski Act), Colo. Rev.Stat. §§ 33-44-101 et seq., bars the plaintiffs’ claims.”
Calvert v. Aspen Skiing Co., 700 F. Supp. 520 (D. Colo. 1988). · cites it 2× “The Court concludes that the Ski Safety Act, C.R.S. §§ 33-44-101 — 33-44-111 (1982), and not § 13-21-115, applies to ski accident cases such as the present.”
Glover v. Vail Corp., 955 F. Supp. 105 (D. Colo. 1997). · cites it 2× “Vail argues that the Colorado Ski Safety Act of 1979 (the Act), Colo.Rev.Stat. § 33-44-101 et seq., precludes recovery on all of Glover’s claims.”
Graven v. Vail Assocs., Inc., 888 P.2d 310 (Colo. Ct. App. 1995). “§ 33-44-101, et seq., C.R.S. (1984 Repl.Vol.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.