Colo. Rev. Stat. » Title 38
Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 38-10-101 (2026)

Conveyances to defraud

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Every conveyance of any estate or interest in the lands, or the rents and profits of lands, and every charge upon lands, or upon the rents and profits thereof, made or created with the intent to defraud prior or subsequent purchasers for a valuable consideration of the same lands, rents, or profits, as against such purchasers, shall be void.

Source: R.S. p. 337, § 1. G.L. § 1251. G.S. § 1510. R.S. 08: § 2655. C.L. § 5100. CSA: C. 71, § 1. CRS 53: § 59-1-1. C.R.S. 1963: § 59-1-1.

Cross references: For the statute of frauds as an affirmative defense, see C.R.C.P. 8(c).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1990–2021 · leading case: Premier Farm Credit, PCA v. W-CATTLE, LLC, 155 P.3d 504 (Colo. Ct. App. 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Premier Farm Credit, PCA v. W-CATTLE, LLC, 155 P.3d 504 (Colo. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 2× “Thus, the statute of frauds does not provide the basis for a claim, but a defense against a claim seeking enforcement of an oral agreement. In addition, the statute does not state that all writings that purport to be contracts are, in fact, valid and binding contracts.”
Univex Int'l, Inc. v. Orix Credit All., Inc., 902 P.2d 877 (Colo. Ct. App. 1995). “See § 38-10-101, et seq., C.R.S. (1982 RepLVol.”
Robert Kint Glover, Gerald Kiefer, Marjorie R. Kiefer Marital Trust, Blair A. Kiefer Fam. Trust, Jane Raeleen Dunn, Friday LLC, & The Est. of Robert Kint Glover, Plaintiffs-Appellants: v. Serratoga Falls LLC Resource Land Holdings LLC Jesse McDowell Town of Timnath Kitchel Lake Dev. Corp. Kitchel Lake Partners, LLC James Righeimer Lee Lowrey & Kenneth Mitchell. Defendants-Appellees: & Gregory Cucarola, Appellant:, 2021 CO 77 (Colo. 2021). · cites it 2× “( 2021 ) (prohibiting fraudulent document recording and clouding title) ; and section 38-10-101 , C.R.S. ( 2021 ) (prohibiting fraudulent conveyance) .”
In Re the Marriage of Lemoine-Hofmann, 827 P.2d 587 (Colo. Ct. App. 1992). “Moreover, oral contracts “otherwise unenforceable under § 38-10-101, et seq., C.R.S. (1982 Repl.Vol.”
Crandell v. Resley, 804 P.2d 272 (Colo. Ct. App. 1990). “Oral contracts otherwise unenforceable under § 38-10-101, et seq., C.R.S (1982 Repl.Vol.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.