Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 38-28-102 (2026)

Parties

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

All persons having any interest, direct, beneficial, contingent, or otherwise, in such property shall be made parties.

Source: L. 49: p. 544, § 2. CSA: C. 122, § 25. CRS 53: § 103-1-2. C.R.S. 1963: § 103- 1-2.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1982–2024 · leading case: Fry & Co. v. Dist. Court Ex Rel. Cnty. of Adams, 653 P.2d 1135 (Colo. 1982).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Fry & Co. v. Dist. Court Ex Rel. Cnty. of Adams, 653 P.2d 1135 (Colo. 1982). · cites it 7× “The petitioners ground their indispensability argument upon section 38-28-102, C.R.S.1973 (1982 Repl.”

Wilson v. Prentiss, 140 P.3d 288 (Colo. Ct. App. 2006). “Sections 38-28-102, 38-28-103, C.R.S.2005.”

Colorado Korean Ass'n v. KOREAN SEN. ASS'N., 151 P.3d 626 (Colo. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 5× “Defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying its motion to dismiss for failure to join an indispensable party pursuant to § 38-28-102, C.R.S.2006. Defendant urges us to conclude that the County was an indispensable party by virtue of its tax lien.”

Johnson v. Ortiz (Colo. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 2× “§ 38-28-102, C.R.S. 2024. The court must completely adjudicate the rights of all parties to the property, § 38-28-103, C.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.