The court at any time may make such orders as it may
deem necessary to promote the ends of justice to completely adjudicate every question and
controversy concerning the title, rights, and interest of all persons whether in being or not,
known or unknown, and may direct the payment and discharge of liens and have the property
sold free from any lien or may apportion any lien among the persons to whom the partition is
made.
Source: L. 49: p. 545, § 10. CSA: C. 122, § 33. CRS 53: § 103-1-10. C.R.S. 1963: §
103-1-10.
MANUFACTURED HOMES
ARTICLE 29
Titles to Manufactured Homes
Editor's note: The substantive provisions of this article were located in part 1 of article 6
of title 42 prior to 1983.
Cross references: For certificates of title to motor vehicles, see the "Certificate of Title
Act", part 1 of article 6 of title 42.
PART 1
TITLES TO MANUFACTURED HOMES
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
10
cases (
5 in the last 5 years), 1981–2026 · leading case:
Young Props. v. Wolflick, 87 P.3d 235 (Colo. Ct. App. 2003).
Young Props. v. Wolflick, 87 P.3d 235 (Colo. Ct. App. 2003).
· cites it 4× “Option to Purchase Wolflick also argues that even if the trial court could order the sale of the property, it abused its discretion because § 38-28-110 does not authorize the trial court to *239 grant the Youngs an option to purchase his interest in the parcel.”
Wilson v. Prentiss, 140 P.3d 288 (Colo. Ct. App. 2006).
· cites it 3× “Section 38-28-110, C.R.S.2005. A. Division of Marital Property Section 14-10-113(3), C.”
Martinez v. Martinez, 638 P.2d 834 (Colo. Ct. App. 1981).
· cites it 3× “Section 38-28-110, C.R.S.1973, provides: “The court at any time may make such orders as it may deem necessary to promote the ends of justice to completely adjudicate every question and controversy concerning the title, rights, and interest of all persons whether in being or not,…”
Keith v. El-Kareh, 729 P.2d 377 (Colo. Ct. App. 1986).
· cites it 3× “Section 38-28-110, C.R.S. (1982 Repl.Vol.”
McNamara v. Mossman, 230 P.3d 1286 (Colo. Ct. App. 2010).
· cites it 2× “§ 38-28-110, C.R.S.2009. However, a court’s function when deciding a partition action is to sever the unity of possession owned by the tenants, not to create new interests in property.”
Courtney Tierra Cantwell (Bankr.D. Colo. 2026).
· cites it 7× “3 The language of Colo. Rev. Stat. § 38-28-110 applied in Martinez remains the same today.”
Bonati v. KDSW (Colo. Ct. App. 2024).
· cites it 3× “§ 38-28-110, C.R.S. 2024. 19 ¶ 43 In ordering a partition by sale, the district court expressly rejected plaintiffs’ argument that the sale should be private.”
Layton v. Toole (Colo. Ct. App. 2025).
· cites it 3× “See § 38-28-110, C.R.S. 2025; C.R.C.P. 105; see also Bd.”
Roley v. Eisele (Colo. Ct. App. 2026).
· cites it 3× “Under section 38-28-110, C.R.S. 2025, “[t]he court at any time may make such orders as it may deem necessary to promote the ends of justice to completely adjudicate every question and controversy concerning the title, rights, and interest of all persons.”
Johnson v. Ortiz (Colo. Ct. App. 2024).
· cites it 2× “” § 38-28-110, C.R.S. 2024. 2. Intervention ¶ 18 Rule 24 permits individuals to intervene in a matter as of right or permissively.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.